Bound surface charge of a cylinder

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the bound surface charges of a cylinder made from a linear dielectric material under an external electric field. The user outlines their approach, identifying the surfaces of the cylinder and applying the formula for bound charge density, σ_bound = P · n̂. However, they realize that their expressions need to incorporate the external electric field, E_ext, and the material's permittivity, ε, to align with the problem's requirements. Clarification is provided that polarization, P, should be expressed in terms of E_ext and ε to derive the correct bound charge values. The conversation emphasizes the importance of including these variables in the final expressions for accurate results.
Taylor_1989
Messages
400
Reaction score
14

Homework Statement


Consider a cyclinder made of linear dielectric material with uniform dipole distribution. An externally applied field ##E_{ext}## is applied in the direction parallel to the axis of the cyclinder. What are the values of the bound chrages at the surface.

Homework Equations


##\sigma_{bound} = P . \hat n##

The Attempt at a Solution


I can't seem to upload the drawing from my phone, so I will do my best to explain what I have done so far.

I drew a cylinder along the x-axis and labled each surface as follows

end of cylinder in negtive x region ##S_1##

body of cyclinder ##S_2##

end of cyclinder in postive x region ##S_3##

The electric field is going from ##S1## to ##S3##

So my values for the give surfaces are as follows

##S1=|P||1|cos(180)=-P=\sigma_b##

##S2=|P||1|cos(90)=0=\sigma_b##

##S3=|P||1|cos(0)=P=\sigma_b##

are these the value that the question is looking for or have I missed what the question is asking me for
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe your answers must be in terms of the given external electric field, ##E_{ext}##. You may need to consider as given a permittivity ##\epsilon## for the material.
 
kuruman said:
I believe your answers must be in terms of the given external electric field, ##E_{ext}##. You may need to consider as given a permittivity ##\epsilon## for the material.

Im not quite sure what you mean? Could you please expand
 
Your answer would be correct if P were a given quantity. It is not. The given quantity is ##E_{ext}## so your answer must have ##E_{ext}## in the final expression on the right side of the expression for ##\sigma_b##. However, this cannot be done unless you assume that ##\epsilon## is also a given quantity because it too must appear on the right side of the expression for ##\sigma_b##. That's my interpretation of what the questioner expects the answer to be.
 
So polaristaion can be wirtten in the form of

##P=X\epsilon E##
 
It's probably more straightforward to use ##\vec{D}=\epsilon_0\vec{E}+\vec{P}##, ##\vec{D}=\epsilon\vec{E}## and the boundary condition at the flat surface of the cylinder.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top