Box hung over pulley at an angle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BlueSkyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Box Pulley
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a pulley system with a block suspended at an angle. The initial assumption of a 45-degree angle for the rope was deemed incorrect without proper justification. Participants emphasized the need for a systematic approach to analyze the forces acting on the pulley, including the relationship between tension and weight. They suggested using trigonometric methods, specifically SOH CAH TOA, to accurately determine the angle and tension. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of rigorous problem-solving techniques in physics.
BlueSkyy
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Box hung over pulley at an angle??

Homework Statement



A pulley is hung from the ceiling by a rope. A block of mass M is suspended by another rope that passes over the pulley and is attached to the wall (the figure below ). The rope fastened to the wall makes a right angle with the wall. Neglect the masses of the rope and the pulley. Find (a) the tension in the rope from which the pulley hangs and (b) the angle that the rope makes with the ceiling.

https://chip.physics.purdue.edu/protected/GiambattistaMimg/chapter-04/fig-038.gif

Homework Equations



Weight = Mg
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
SOH CAH TOA (for finding the angle)

The Attempt at a Solution



For the angle, I'm going to guess 45 degrees, just because it seems like it would be correct (it would be a "natural" angle for a system like this to be at.)

As for the tension, i know that the tension in the *rope attached to the box* is the same all the way through (=Mg) and that the tension in the *rope attached to the pulley* must be related to this somehow, probably using SOH CAH TOA to find the angle or the length of the sides of the triangle that is formed...

It's a multiple choice question, the choices being:
https://chip.physics.purdue.edu/protected/GiambattistaMimg/chapter-04/eqn_2002.gif
https://chip.physics.purdue.edu/protected/GiambattistaMimg/chapter-04/eqn_2001.gif
https://chip.physics.purdue.edu/protected/GiambattistaMimg/chapter-04/eqn_2003.gif
 
Physics news on Phys.org
never mind, i figured it out myself...
45 degrees was correct, and i just used TAN 45 to find the lengths of the other sides of the isosceles triangle
 
BlueSkyy said:
never mind, i figured it out myself...
45 degrees was correct, and i just used TAN 45 to find the lengths of the other sides of the isosceles triangle

You cannot solve a problem in this way. Here you have just assumed that the angle is 45. what is the proof that the angle is 45. There would be some proper method for solving this problem.
 
There are things you can assume, such as:

The force on the rope at the wall is equal to the tension. You can assume that vertical component of the force on the pulley is equal to the force the weight applies on the rope. I'd look at the pulley as a point with 3 forces acting on it, and solve for the angles and forces that way.
 
hmm i rather think the equatioon as toa cah soh
haha.
yea blackwyvern is rigth. that is the way to solve the Q
(visit my blog!)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top