Box sliding down a ramp question

  • Thread starter Thread starter francescalynn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Ramp Sliding
AI Thread Summary
A block sliding down a frictionless ramp at an angle of 11 degrees over a distance of 306 meters requires careful calculation of time and acceleration. The initial approach incorrectly used the height instead of the distance traveled along the ramp and misapplied gravitational acceleration. The correct acceleration down the ramp is derived from the formula a = gsin(theta), which leads to accurate time calculations. After correcting the arithmetic, the final time for the block to reach the bottom was determined to be approximately 18.901 seconds. Understanding the forces acting on the block is crucial for solving such problems accurately.
francescalynn
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
In order to get an appreciation for the time scales involved, think about a block that slides without friction down a ramp that is inclined at an angle q above the horizontal. Initially the block is at rest a distance s (measured along the plane) from the bottom. Click the button marked “DATA” for specific values of q and s. (Remember these numbers; you will need them later.) Calculate the time required for the block to slide to the bottom.

For my given values I have: distance, s = 306 m, and q = 11 deg
To find the time it takes for the block to slide to the bottom, I tried:

d = 306sin(11) = 58.4 m

d = v0t - 1/2at^2

58.4 = 0 - 1/2(-9.8)t^2

t = 3.45017

and

1/2mv^2 - 1/2mv0^2 = F*d

1/2v^2 - 1/2(0)^2 = a*d

1/2v^2 = -9.81(-306sin(11))

v = 33.38289 m/s

v = v0 + at

t = 3.44898
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can see how you tried this problem. However, when a block is on a ramp the situation is slightly different. Take a look at the attached diagram. This is how the forces are acting on this block. The force normal comes into play, and of course in this case, there is no force friction. So the only two forces in action are the weight of the block and the force normal.

Take the plane of the ramp as the x-axis, as on the diagram. Then the force normal is a y-force, the weight has x and y components. The y-component and force normal should cancel out (can you see why?) and we are left with the x-component of the weight, which is the reason the block moves. Equate that with ma, find the acceleration, then go on as you did in your solution.
Hope this helps, let me know if you have any questions! :)
 
Last edited:
francescalynn said:
In order to get an appreciation for the time scales involved, think about a block that slides without friction down a ramp that is inclined at an angle q above the horizontal. Initially the block is at rest a distance s (measured along the plane) from the bottom. Click the button marked “DATA” for specific values of q and s. (Remember these numbers; you will need them later.) Calculate the time required for the block to slide to the bottom.

For my given values I have: distance, s = 306 m, and q = 11 deg
To find the time it takes for the block to slide to the bottom, I tried:

d = 306sin(11) = 58.4 m
This is the height of the block at its start point, not the distance traveled by the block
d = v0t - 1/2at^2

58.4 = 0 - 1/2(-9.8)t^2
you have to correct the distance and also the accelerataion. The acceleration is not g, the block is not in free fall. Newton's laws will help you find the acceleration down the plane.
and

1/2mv^2 - 1/2mv0^2 = F*d

1/2v^2 - 1/2(0)^2 = a*d

1/2v^2 = -9.81(-306sin(11))

v = 33.38289 m/s
this looks OK
v = v0 + at

t = 3.44898
Correct the value of 'a' using the value you found in part 1.
 
whoops... arithmetical error

once I fixed it I got

t = sqrt(306/.5*9.8*sin(11)) = 18.901, which was correct

thank you for the help :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top