Brachistochrone on the surface of a sphere

TimJ
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement

I'm trying to solve the brachistochrone problem between two points on the surface of a sphere.

2. The attempt at a solution

The Lagrangian for this problem in spherical coordinates is
<br /> L=\frac{1}{2}m \left(r^2 \left (\frac{d \theta}{dt}\right)^2+r^2 \sin^2(\theta) \left(\frac{d \phi}{dt}\right)^2\right)-mgr\cos(\theta)<br />

After applying the Euler-Lagrange equation we get:

For \theta:

\frac{\partial L}{\partial (\frac{d \theta}{dt})} = m r^2\frac{d \theta}{dt}

\frac{\partial L}{\partial \theta} = m r^2 \left(\frac{d \phi}{dt}\right)^2 \sin(\theta) \cos(\theta) + mg r \sin(\theta)

<br /> \frac{\partial L}{\partial \theta} - \frac{d}{dt} \left ( \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\frac{d \theta}{dt})} \right ) = 0 \;\; \Rightarrow \;\; <br /> m r^2 \left(\frac{d \phi}{dt}\right)^2 \sin(\theta) \cos(\theta) + mg r \sin(\theta) -<br /> m r^2 \frac{d^2 \theta}{dt^2}=0<br />

For \phi:

\frac{\partial L}{\partial \phi} = 0 \;\; \Rightarrow \;\; \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\frac{d \phi}{dt})}=m r^2 \sin^2(\theta) \frac{d \phi}{dt}= const.

Now we have two equations:

<br /> \frac{d^2 \theta}{dt^2}-\frac{g}{r}\sin(\theta)-\sin(\theta) \cos(\theta) \left(\frac{d \phi}{dt}\right)^2=0<br />

and

<br /> m r^2 \sin^2(\theta) \frac{d \phi}{dt}= const. = A<br />

And here is where it stopped. I don't know how to solve this two equations.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The two things I first observe about that pair of equations is:
(1) It's easy to eliminate one of the variables
(2) A change of variable could help simplify things
 
Then I get this equation:

<br /> \frac{d^2 \theta}{dt^2}-\frac{g}{r}\sin(\theta)- <br /> \frac{A^2 \cos(\theta)}{(m r^2)^2 \sin^3(\theta) }=0<br />

I tried to solve it with Mathematica, but i didn't get a result.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top