Brachistochrone problem with friction

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the brachistochrone problem with friction, specifically focusing on the transition between various equations in a mathematical demonstration. A user seeks clarification on the integration process from equation (29) to (30) and the subsequent steps leading to equations (32) and (33). Another participant confirms that equation (30) is derived from integrating equation (29), while a different user expresses difficulty in understanding the transition from equations (28) to (29) using the Euler Lagrange equation. The conversation highlights the challenges in applying mathematical concepts to the problem. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexities involved in solving the brachistochrone problem with friction.
janonus
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey,
I am doing some research on the brachistochrone problem WITH frictions. I found the following demonstration on the web.
The beginning is ok. But I can't understand how the managed to pass between (29) and (30) and between (30) and ((32), (33)).

If someone could help me, it would be very nice !
thanks :)

The link to the article : http://mathworld.wolfram.com/BrachistochroneProblem.html
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To go from 29 to 30, it is pretty clear that they have integrated one time. Eq(29) is second order while eq(30) is first order. What you need to do is convince yourself that 30 is indeed the result of integrating 29.
 
  • Like
Likes janonus
Yeah, I got it !
Tanks for your help Dr.D ! :smile:
 
Hi, not sure if it is ok to revive an old question, I am also having trouble following some of the steps in this demonstration, in particular steps (28) to (29). I know what the Euler Lagrange equation is, but applying it to the integrand in (28) does not appear to simplify to (29). Would anyone be able to help me with this?
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top