Bragg Diffraction: Axes Length for FeO, CoO, NiO

  • Thread starter Thread starter broegger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bragg Diffraction
broegger
Messages
257
Reaction score
0
Hi,

In the solid form FeO, CoO and NiO all has the NaCl-structure (simple cubic). In a series of diffraction experiments with x-rays (\lambda = 0.15406~\text{nm}) one found reflexes from the (111), (200) and (220)-planes with the following \theta-values (\theta is the angle in Bragg's law, 2d\sin\theta=\lambda):

FeO: 18.04 20.95 30.28
CoO: 18.26 21.20 30.77
NiO: 18.63 21.64 31.45

The first number is the angle corresponding to the reflection from the (111)-plane, the second number corresponds to reflection from the (200)-plane and the third from the (220)-plane.

Question: What are the axis length for the three unit cells? Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you can use Bragg's law to solve for the d for each angle. Now you need to know how the spacing between certain lattice planes, d, is related to the lattice constant (length of a side of the cubic cell). For example, for the (100) planes, the spacing is just a, for (110), it is a*sqrt(2), and so on.
 
What is the general formula relating the interplanar spacing (of some hkl family) to the lattice parameter in a cubic structure ?
 
Gokul43201 said:
What is the general formula relating the interplanar spacing (of some hkl family) to the lattice parameter in a cubic structure ?

I don't know, but man, I'd like to know that formula :!) I'm having some trouble visualizing this, to say the least.
 
I'm sure it's in the text : d = \frac{a}{\sqrt{h^2+k^2+l^2}}
 
Thank you very much. My book is Descriptive Inorganic Chemistry by Canham and Overton and I can't find that formula in it.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top