Bragg's law and double-slit experiment

UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
I am asked to construct a double-slit experiment for 5eV electrons. The first minimum of the diffraction pattern needs to occur at 5 degrees, what must the separation of slits be?

I'm guessing that I should use Bragg's law but I don't know how to calcualte a minumum because bragg's law is for maximums.

\lambda=\frac{1240eVnm}{5eV}

n \lambda=2dsin \theta

1x240nm=2dsin5

i would solve for d but wouldn't that be a maximum?

Also, I am asked to determin how far the slits have to be from the detector plan if the first minima on each side of the central maximum are separated by 1 cm.

we know that theta is 5 and the height is 1 cm, so... using 1cm/theta(5)=11.4 cm? that doesn't seem right to me.

any ideas as to what i am doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Some references on interference and multiple slits.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/mulslidi.html#c2

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/slits.html

The maxima occur where the difference in distance is an integral multiple of wavelength, so that two peaks constructively interact. The minima occur where a peak and trough occur, or one wave is a half-wavelength out of phase with the other, so that they destructively interfere.

So a minimum should occur approximately halfway between two adjacent maxima.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top