Branching Fraction of b -> s γ Decay

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Safinaz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fraction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the branching fraction of the decay process ## b \to s \gamma ## and its relationship to the decay width. Participants explore the definition of branching fractions, calculations of decay widths, and discrepancies in results obtained through different methods.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the meaning of branching fractions and how to calculate the decay width for the process ## b \to s \gamma ##.
  • Another participant defines the branching fraction in terms of decay widths, indicating that it is the ratio of the partial width to the total width of the particle.
  • There is a suggestion that to find the decay width of ## b \to s \gamma ##, one must multiply the branching fraction by the total width of the B meson.
  • A participant calculates the total decay width using the mean lifetime of the ## B_0 ## meson, resulting in a partial decay width for ## s \gamma ##.
  • Another participant challenges the calculation of the total decay width, providing a different value for the Planck constant and suggesting a different partial width result.
  • One participant expresses that their calculation using FormCalc and LoopTools yields a significantly larger value for the partial width, prompting a request for clarification on the magnitude of the difference.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct value of the decay width for ## b \to s \gamma ##, with differing calculations and interpretations presented. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the accuracy of the various approaches and results.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions used for decay widths and branching fractions, as well as discrepancies in numerical calculations that depend on the methods employed by participants.

Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
Hi all,

I found that the branching fraction ## b \to s \gamma ## decay is given by
## B \to K \gamma ## ~ 10^-4 , but now I want to know if I calculate the decay width of ## b \to s \gamma ##, what it should equals ? In other words I don't understand what does a branching fraction mean ..

Bests.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The branching fraction of a certain decay ##A\to B+C## is simply defined as:

$$
\mathcal{BR}(A\to B+C)=\frac{\Gamma(A\to B+C)}{\Gamma^{tot}_A},
$$

where ##\Gamma_A^{tot}## is the total width of the particle A.
 
So the branching fraction is the same as the branching ratio.

But now what is the decay width of ## b \to s \gamma ##, if the b→sγ branching fraction has been calculated to be
## B \to K \gamma ## ~ 10^-4 ?
 
Last edited:
You simply have to multiply the branching fraction (or ratio) by the total width of the B meson.
 
I found in PDG that the mean life time of ## B_0 ## is ~ 10^-12 s, so its total decay width ## \Gamma = h / 2 \pi \tau ## ~ 10^-25 GeV.s. / 10^-12 s ~ 10^-13 GeV . Which means the partial decay width of s ## \gamma ## will be ~ 10^-17 GeV .
 
I think your calculation is wrong. The Plank constant is ##\hbar \simeq 6.58\times 10^{-16} eV\cdot s## and I would say:

$$
\Gamma=\frac{\hbar}{\tau}\simeq6.6\times10^{-4} \;eV.
$$

To be fair I don't know if this is a reasonable value for the total width but I think so. Anyways, in this case you obtain the partial width to be ##\sim10^{-8}\;eV##
 
Which means the partial width ~ ## 10^{-17} GeV ## ..

The problem is I calculate this width by FormCalc and LoopTools and I get it much larger !
 
What is "much larger"? Factor 10? 10 orders of magnitude?
Is the result given in GeV or eV?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K