Bridge rectifier output voltage

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the output voltage waveform of a bridge rectifier circuit, questioning why it lacks a DC offset of E. It highlights that D1 conducts when Vs exceeds E, yet many waveforms begin conduction at 0 volts. The conversation also touches on the differences between using diodes and thyristors, with the latter being referred to as half-controlled. Additionally, the impact of an inductor on the circuit is noted, emphasizing the importance of specifying output nodes for accurate waveform identification. Overall, understanding the circuit's configuration is crucial for analyzing the output characteristics.
i_am_stupid
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm trying to figure out why the output voltage waveform of this circuit would not include a DC offset of E. My understanding is that D1 becomes forward biased when Vs > E, and so that is when it should conduct. Every waveform drawing I've seen, on the other hand, begins conduction at 0 volts.

FnKLCs7.png


Also, what would be the difference between this circuit and one that replaces two diodes with thyristors? I've seen the latter referred to as half-controlled.

Thanks!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I didn't analyze the circuit in detail, but don't forget the coil: At Vs close to 0 you have the fastest voltage changes -> current changes in the resistor -> the coil will have some induced voltage.
 
At which nodes is the output voltage taken?
 
Take the inductor out of the circuit and you have a diode clipping circuit, where the diode will not conduct until the input waveform Vs > Vd + E. You can see the if you remove the R as shown and instead add an R to the anodes of D1 and D3, to obtain the textbook diode clipping circuit, where the output is taken anode of D1 to the bottom of the circuit. Of course, you have another diode in there, D2, but that is just another 0.7v ( for silicon ).

There is no DC bias voltage in a clipping circuit in the normal sense of where the output voltage for a clipping circuit is taken. Textbooks will add in a capacitor for DC bias and show the output waveform at the appropriate connections.

Then you can add in the inductor to see how that affects the circuit.

Skeptic is correct. One has to specify the nodes to properly identify the output waveform.
 
Last edited:
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
suppose you have two capacitors with a 0.1 Farad value and 12 VDC rating. label these as A and B. label the terminals of each as 1 and 2. you also have a voltmeter with a 40 volt linear range for DC. you also have a 9 volt DC power supply fed by mains. you charge each capacitor to 9 volts with terminal 1 being - (negative) and terminal 2 being + (positive). you connect the voltmeter to terminal A2 and to terminal B1. does it read any voltage? can - of one capacitor discharge + of the...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top