Bullwhip wave mechanics: What changes?

AI Thread Summary
As a bullwhip wave propagates toward the tip, the amplitude changes rather than the wavelength. This phenomenon is likened to sound waves in a medium with decreasing density, though the mechanics differ since sound waves are longitudinal. The discussion highlights a divide between proponents of supersonic and non-supersonic whip cracking, with experts disagreeing on the underlying mechanics. A key explanation involves the concentration of kinetic energy into smaller whip segments, which influences the wave's behavior. Overall, understanding the end of the wave's transmission is crucial for grasping the full implications of wave mechanics in this context.
Greylorn
Gold Member
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
What wave property changes as a bullwhip wave propagates toward the tip? Wavelength or amplitude?

The problem seemed at first analogous to that of describing the behavior of a sound wave propagating through air of linearly decreasing density, except that sound is longitudinal.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This might help you think about it :)

http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/Demos/reflect/reflect.html
 
This is one of those controversial issues that seesaws between rival camps: in this case the supersonic versus the non-supersonic factions. Even skilled whip crackers disagree. The best explanation I've found so far is here: http://home.comcast.net/~a-mcnibble/Rants/WhyWhipsCrack.pdf according to which it's the concentration of kinetic energy into a smaller and smaller whip segment that does it.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
univox360 said:
This might help you think about it :)

http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/Demos/reflect/reflect.html

Thank you! The link answered the question in favor of amplitude, and is a fine exposition of other aspects of wave mechanics, providing even more to think about. Greatly appreciated.
 
Bill_K said:
This is one of those controversial issues that seesaws between rival camps: in this case the supersonic versus the non-supersonic factions. Even skilled whip crackers disagree. The best explanation I've found so far is here: http://home.comcast.net/~a-mcnibble/Rants/WhyWhipsCrack.pdf according to which it's the concentration of kinetic energy into a smaller and smaller whip segment that does it.

Bill,
Great link! Although I was more interested in the mechanics of a transverse wave in a variable medium (looking for cosmological implications) than in what happens at the end of a wave's transmission, I was being short sighted. The end may be the most important part of the problem. Thank you for the insight!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top