- #1
digi99
- 183
- 0
It's just an idea if V could be greater than C (proofed in the future maybe).
Look to this derivation of Lorenz (university Australia) : http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/einsteinlight/jw/module4_time_dilation.htm" [Broken]
Here you can see how Jasper looks to light, is it ever proofed that the speed of light is also C on this way ? But the derivation leads to the same results as in Lorenz ..
I can understand that C is maximized in its own direction, but if you look from an other view to photons maybe it's that not the case anymore, Japser's light speed could be SQRT(V2 + C2).
I should think a light beam is only a light beam in its own direction, with other words if the front of the photons goes in the same direction of the light beam.
So in the case it would not be valid to look to light in this way, V is also not maximized mathematically.
And if this would be correct, and this derivation is not valid but leads also to the same results, somewhere goes something not valid in the Lorenz derivation ...
Just an idea ...
Look to this derivation of Lorenz (university Australia) : http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/einsteinlight/jw/module4_time_dilation.htm" [Broken]
Here you can see how Jasper looks to light, is it ever proofed that the speed of light is also C on this way ? But the derivation leads to the same results as in Lorenz ..
I can understand that C is maximized in its own direction, but if you look from an other view to photons maybe it's that not the case anymore, Japser's light speed could be SQRT(V2 + C2).
I should think a light beam is only a light beam in its own direction, with other words if the front of the photons goes in the same direction of the light beam.
So in the case it would not be valid to look to light in this way, V is also not maximized mathematically.
And if this would be correct, and this derivation is not valid but leads also to the same results, somewhere goes something not valid in the Lorenz derivation ...
Just an idea ...
Last edited by a moderator: