Calculate attractive force between Cu2+ and O2- ions.

  • Thread starter Thread starter robertjordan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Ions
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The attractive force between Cu2+ and O2- ions in ceramic CuO can be calculated using Coulomb's law. The relevant equation is F = k * (|q1 * q2|) / r2, where q1 and q2 are the charges of the ions, and r is the interatomic separation of 200 pm. By substituting q1 as 3.204 × 10-19 C and q2 as -3.204 × 10-19 C, the calculated attractive force is 2.307 × 10-8 N, confirming the correctness of the approach.

PREREQUISITES
  • Coulomb's law for electrostatic force calculation
  • Understanding of ion charges and valences
  • Basic knowledge of unit conversions (e.g., pm to meters)
  • Familiarity with fundamental constants such as the charge of an electron
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Coulomb's law in electrostatics
  • Learn about the properties of ionic compounds and their bonding characteristics
  • Explore the concept of interatomic distances and their significance in materials science
  • Investigate the role of permittivity in electrostatic calculations
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, materials scientists, and anyone interested in understanding ionic interactions and forces in solid-state materials.

robertjordan
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the attractive force between a pair of Cu2+ and O2- ions in the ceramic CuO that has an interatomic separation of 200pm.


Homework Equations


E_A= -\frac{(z_1\cdot e)(z_2\cdot e)}{4\pi\cdot\epsilon_o\cdot r}
Where z_1 and z_2 are the valences of the two ion types, e is the charge of an electron (1.602 * 10^-19 C), epsilon_o is the permittivity of a vacuum (8.85*10^-12 F/m), and r is the distance between the two ions.

E_n=\frac{m\cdot e^4 \cdot z^2}{2n^2 \cdot \hbar^2}
Where m= mass of electron, z= atomic number, e= charge of an electron, n is the energy level.


The Attempt at a Solution


The problem is that I don't know how to find z_1 and z_2. Do I use E_n=\frac{m\cdot e^4 \cdot z^2}{2n^2 \cdot \hbar^2} to find the energy in the valence electrons? The problem is that I don't know how to use that equation because when I plug in what I think I should for the variables it gives me an answer with units all wrong... Here's an example from another problem where I tried to use that equation...

plugging in 1 for n, 3 for z, 9.11*10^-31 kg for m, -1.602*10^-19 Coulombs for e, and 1.054572×10^-34 J*s for h, we get
E_1= ((9.11*10^-31 kg))*((-1.602*10^-19 C)^4)*(3^2)/(2(1.054572×10^-34 J s)^2) = 2.428×10^-37 s^6A^4/(kg m^4) (second to the 6 amperes to the fourth per kilogram meter to the fourth).


So what to do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Why are you writing these formulas for energies?
The problem asks to calculate the attractive force.
The charges of each ion are given in the problem.
 
nasu said:
Why are you writing these formulas for energies?
The problem asks to calculate the attractive force.
The charges of each ion are given in the problem.

Well I don't know the force equation, my teacher only gave us the equation for bonding energy...
Perhaps since energy=force*distance we can find force by dividing our energy equation by some distance?


I'm still stuck but I see now that z_1= 2 and z_2=-2.

Any more help?
 
nasu said:
See Coulomb's law. For example, here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coulomb's_law

What class is this? Chemistry?

The equation F= ke(|q1q2|)/r2 looks good.

So if I plug in 3.204 × 10^-19 coulombs for q1 and -3.204 × 10^-19 coulombs for q2 (because O2- has a net charge equal to -2 times the charge of an electron and Cu2+ has a net charge equal to twice the charge of an electron), then I get

2.307*10-8 N of force. Does that seem right?
 
Yes, it looks OK.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K