Calculate Dielectric Thickness for 100pF Capacitor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kev1n
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thickness
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the dielectric thickness for a 100pF capacitor with plates measuring 5mm x 10mm and a relative permittivity of 12, the formula d = eA/C is used. The area of the plates is calculated as 0.05 m². Initial calculations yielded an incorrect value of 6,000,000, prompting a reevaluation. The correct approach involves using d = Eo x Er x A / C, resulting in a thickness of approximately 0.0513mm. Accurate dielectric thickness is crucial for achieving the desired capacitance.
Kev1n
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
1.
A capacitor is formed by 2 parallel plates separated by a dielectric of relative permattivity er = 12, the capacitor plates are 5mm x 10mm. Calculate the thickness of the dielectric required to create a capacitor of 100pF




2. C = eA / d therefore d=eA/C, we have C 100 x 10-9, area of pates 5x10-3 x 10x10-3 = 50x10-3mm2 (0.05m2



3. C = eA / D = 12 x 0.05 / 100 x 10-9
= 6000000
This is a massive figure so I am guessing incorrect any pointers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kev1n said:
1.
A capacitor is formed by 2 parallel plates separated by a dielectric of relative permattivity er = 12, the capacitor plates are 5mm x 10mm. Calculate the thickness of the dielectric required to create a capacitor of 100pF




2. C = eA / d therefore d=eA/C, we have C 100 x 10-9, area of pates 5x10-3 x 10x10-3 = 50x10-3mm2 (0.05m2



3. C = eA / D = 12 x 0.05 / 100 x 10-9
= 6000000
This is a massive figure so I am guessing incorrect any pointers


Should I have used d = Eo x Er x A / C

12 x 8.85x10-12 x 50 x 10-3 / 100 x 10-9 = 5.31x10-5 = 0.0513mm
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top