Calculate Kinetic Energy Decrease: Rotational Energy

AI Thread Summary
In the interaction between two cylinders, the conservation of angular momentum applies rather than conservation of kinetic energy, leading to a decrease in kinetic energy. The final angular speed is derived from the equation I_1ω_i = (I_1 + I_2)ω_f, showing that ω_f is less than ω_i. The initial rotational energy is E_i = 0.5I_1ω_i^2, while the final energy is E_f = 0.5(I_1 + I_2)(I_1^2ω_i^2/(I_1 + I_2)^2). The ratio of final to initial rotational energy is E_f/E_i = I_1/(I_1 + I_2), confirming that kinetic energy decreases in this system. This scenario is analogous to an inelastic collision where energy is not conserved.
UrbanXrisis
Messages
1,192
Reaction score
1
initially, there is a cylinder with a moment of inertia I_1 and angular velocity \omega_i A second cylinder that has a moment of inertia of I_2 and is not rotatiing drops onto the first cylinder show http://home.earthlink.net/~urban-xrisis/clip_image001.jpg . There is friction between the surfaces and the two objects reach the same angular speed of \omega_f

I need to show that the kinetic energy decreases in this interaction and also calcualte the ratio of the final rotational energy to the initial rotational energy.

.5I_i \omega _i^2 = .5I_f \omega _f^2
I_1 \omega _i^2 = (I_1+I_2) \omega _f^2
ratio of initial to final:
\frac{\omega _i^2}{\omega _f^2} = \frac{I_1+I_2}{I_1}

how do I show the decrease in rotational energy?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
UrbanXrisis said:
.5I_i \omega _i^2 = .5I_f \omega _f^2
I_1 \omega _i^2 = (I_1+I_2) \omega _f^2
ratio of initial to final:
\frac{\omega _i^2}{\omega _f^2} = \frac{I_1+I_2}{I_1}
This is wrong.
You have conservation of angular momentum, not conservation of kinetic energy.
 
Last edited:
UrbanXrisis said:
I need to show that the kinetic energy decreases in this interaction and also calcualte the ratio of the final rotational energy to the initial rotational energy.

.5I_i \omega _i^2 = .5I_f \omega _f^2
I_1 \omega _i^2 = (I_1+I_2) \omega _f^2
ratio of initial to final:
\frac{\omega _i^2}{\omega _f^2} = \frac{I_1+I_2}{I_1}

how do I show the decrease in rotational energy?
You can't do it with your equation. Your equation says that energy is conserved.

This is analagous to an inelastic collision where the two objects collide and remain together after the collision.

Since there is no external torque on the system, we know that angular momentum is conserved. So:

I_1\omega_i = (I_1 + I_2)\omega_f

\omega_f = \frac{I_1\omega_i}{I_1 + I_2}

The initial energy is:

E_i = \frac{1}{2}I_1\omega_i^2

E_f = \frac{1}{2}(I_1 + I_2)\omega_f^2

E_f = \frac{1}{2}(I_1 + I_2)\frac{I_1^2\omega_i^2}{(I_1 + I_2)^2}

E_f = \frac{1}{2}\frac{I_1^2\omega_i^2}{(I_1 + I_2)}

comparing the two energies:

\frac{E_f}{E_i} = \frac{\frac{I_1^2\omega_i^2}{(I_1 + I_2)}}{I_1\omega_i^2}

\frac{E_f}{E_i} = \frac{I_1}{(I_1 + I_2)}

AM
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top