Calculate Surface Charge Densities for Parallel Plates

tigigi
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
2 infinite parallel plates separated by a distance s are at the potentials zero and V0.
find the surface charge densities on the plates.

I got the answer that it first calculate E and then as

1. x=o, Ex = σ / ε, then could know σ
2. x=s, Ex = - σ / ε ---> here's what I don't know. why there's a minus sign here ?

Thank you so much ~
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's another question in EM.

the original question is like below :

consider a spherically symmetric charge distribution ρ = ρ(r). By dividing the charge distribution into spherical shells, find the potential and the eletrica field strength in terms of ρ(r)

I got the answer that it first consider it as charge only on a shell with radius r', get E and V in terms of σ, then infinitely many this kind of shells build a sphere with charge density ρ(r), and then it shows that :

σ =[ 4π (r')^2 dr' ρ(r) ] / 4π (r')^2 = ρ(r') dr' = σ(r')

I don't get this. how come would have this equation ?
it seems σ(r') should be : total charge / surface area, and shouldn't total charge be
(4/3) π (r')^3 ρ(r) ?

Thank you.
σ =
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top