Calculate the age of the Universe at a temperature

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster attempts to calculate the age of the Universe at a temperature of T = 1 MeV, under the assumption that a(t=0) = 0. They have calculated the Hubble parameter H at this temperature and are exploring the implications of their assumptions in a radiation-dominated Universe.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of the Hubble parameter and its relationship to the scale factor a(t). Questions arise regarding the significance of the assumption a(t=0) = 0 and its role in the derivation process.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide insights into the necessity of the initial condition for the integration process, while others express uncertainty about the implications of this condition. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and clarifications regarding the mathematical derivations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of defining initial conditions in cosmological equations and the potential impact of these definitions on the results. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clarity in the derivation steps, particularly concerning integration constants.

Denver Dang
Messages
143
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I've been told to calculate the age of the Universe at T = 1 \, \text{MeV}, assuming that a(t=0)=0.

Homework Equations


Now, I've already calculated the value of H at that temperature, which was around H(1\,\text{MeV}) \approx 0.6 \,\text{s}^{-1}. I've also shown, that in a radiation dominated Universe, which I assume much be the case at T = 1 \, \text{MeV}, that:
H = \frac{1}{2}t^{-1}

The Attempt at a Solution


So basically, my idea was just to solve for t in that equation, and use the value for H I calculated, and then I end up with t = 0.85 \, \text{s}, which seems okay reasonable to me, but, my main question is the info: "assuming that a(t=0)=0". I haven't really used that information here, so either it's just not important, or I have missed something. But what ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot derive ##H = \frac{1}{2}t^{-1}## without that convention. It is needed to define where t=0 is.
 
Well, I have shown that:

\rho _R =\rho_{R0}\left(\frac{a_0}{a}\right)^{4}

So from the Friedmann equation I get:

\begin{align}
\frac{\dot a^{2}}{a^{2}} &= \frac{8 \pi G}{3} \frac{\rho_{R0}}{a^{4}} \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
\left(a\frac{da}{dt}\right)^{2} &= \frac{8 \pi G}{3} \rho_{R0} \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
a\frac{da}{dt} &= \sqrt{\frac{8 \pi G}{3}\rho_{R0}} \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
a\,da &= \sqrt{\frac{8 \pi G}{3}\rho_{R0}} \,\, dt \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
\int a\, da &= \sqrt{\frac{8 \pi G}{3}\rho_{R0}} \int dt \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
\frac{1}{2} a^{2} &= \sqrt{\frac{8 \pi G}{3}\rho_{R0}} \, t \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
a &= \sqrt[4]{\frac{32 \pi G}{3}\rho_{R0}} \, t^{1/2} \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
a &\propto t^{1/2}
\end{align}

And from that I, again, can use the Friedmann equation, giving:

\begin{align}
H &= \frac{\dot a}{a} \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
H &= \frac{\frac{da}{dt}}{a} \nonumber \\
&\Updownarrow \nonumber \\
H &= \frac{1}{t^{1/2}} \frac{d}{dt}t^{1/2} \nonumber \\
&= \frac{1}{t^{1/2}} \left(\frac{1}{2}\frac{1}{t^{1/2}}\right) \nonumber \\
&= \frac{1}{2} t^{-1}
\end{align}

That's how I got the other equation.
 
The step where you perform the integration over dt and over a da should have a free integration constant. Fixing a(t=0)=0 sets this constant to zero.
 
Hmmm, I'm not sure I follow. How does that help me ?
 
What do you mean with "help"? You asked where you need the additional information you had, and I answered that question. The result is the same as before, but now with a correct derivation.
 
Ah, I see what you mean now. Sorry for the confusing on my part.
Thank you very much :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K