Calculate the y component of the electric field at a generic point(x,y)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the y component of the electric field generated by an electric dipole positioned in the x-y plane. The dipole consists of a positive charge at (+a, 0) and a negative charge at (-a, 0). The user attempts to apply the electric field equation from point charges, specifically using the gradient of potential, but struggles with the vector addition of the electric fields from both charges. Clarification is sought on the correct approach to combine these electric vectors effectively. The thread emphasizes the importance of using the appropriate equations to derive the electric field at a generic point (x, y).
blueyellow

Homework Statement



an electric dipole is placed in the x-y plane, with the positive charge +q placed in position (+a, 0) and the negative charge -q placed in position (-a, 0)

define r(subscript +) and r(subscript -) the vectors connecting the point defined by r and the two points (+a, 0) and (-a, 0), and r(subscript+) and r(subscript -) their magnitudes; calculate the y component of the electric field at a generic point (x, y) of the plane as a function of r(subscript +) and r(subscript -) (it is quicker to use directly the field equation from a point charge than using the potential)

The Attempt at a Solution



E=-gradV=q/(4 pi epsilon0)(1/(r^2)) r-hat

E=q/(4pi epsilon0) [(1/([r(+)]^2 +(x+a)^2))+(1/([r(-)]^2 + (x-a)^2))]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the above was a hint:

"... (it is quicker to use directly the field equation from a point charge than using the potential) ... "

The first line of your solution you have E=-gradV ...

I think you are to just add two electric vectors?
 
sorry, I still don't understand. where have I gone wrong?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top