Calculate Total Energy Required to Melt 100g of Lead

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the total energy required to melt 100g of lead, first determine the heat needed to raise the temperature from 25°C to its melting point of 328°C using the formula q = mc(deltaT), resulting in 4.8x10^3 J. Next, calculate the energy required to melt the lead using q = n(deltaH), which yields 2.4 kJ after finding the number of moles. The total energy is the sum of these two values, and it is important to express the final answer in consistent units, either kJ or J. Clarification on unit preference may be necessary based on instructor guidelines. This approach effectively combines thermal energy calculations for phase changes.
atOnz
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
The specific heat capacity of solid lead is 0.159J/g°C, the molar enthalpy of fusion is 5.0kJ/mol, and the melting point of lead is 328°C. Calculate the total energy required to change 100g of lead at 25°C to molten lead at it's melting point.

I don't even know where to start, I know q=mc(delta)t and q=n(delta)H but I don't know which to use or when.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
atOnz said:
(snip)I know q=mc(delta)t and q=n(delta)H but I don't know which to use or when.

At least make a stab at it --- what's q? m? c? deltaT? n? deltaH? Look at the definitions of those quantities.
 
Fair enough, the least I can do is try it. Basically I will find the heat required to bring the lead to it's melting point using q = mc(delta)t.
So, q = (100g)(0.159/J/g°C)(328°C-25°C)...
q = 4.8x10^3 J.

After finding that out I need to find the energy required to actually melt the lead and change it's form from solid to a liquid. I would use q = n(delta)H.

n = the amount of moles per the 100g given. So 100g / 207.2g/mol = 0.483mol.

q = (0.483mol)(5.0kJ/mol) = 2.4kJ.
----------------------------------------
So I have some numbers, and I assume that I add the two together. If I do infact have to do this, which unit (kJ or J) should I express it in?
 
atOnz said:
(snip)So I have some numbers, and I assume that I add the two together. If I do infact have to do this, which unit (kJ or J) should I express it in?

See? Not so hard was it? Units? Pick one, or use both --- delH, or q, = x.yzx kJ, or xyzx J. If you've got an obsessive-compulsive, anal-retentive teacher, use whatever you've been told --- "both" usually keeps such people happy.
 
Haha alright. I'd normally follow your "obsessive-compulsive, anal-retentive teacher" advice but this is the first set of work I've passed into him, and he has yet to say what he preferrs.

It's not that I can't do the work, it's that I hate not knowing if I'm right or wrong or even in the same ball park.

Thank you for your help!

-Jay
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top