Calculate X-Ray Wavelength for Lead Target

  • Thread starter Thread starter conniechiwa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wavelengths X-ray
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the wavelength of the Kα line for a lead target in an X-ray unit, using the energy equations for electrons. The kinetic energy (KE) of the accelerated electrons is derived from the atomic number of lead, resulting in a voltage of approximately 89229.6 V. The energy of the emitted X-ray is calculated using the equation E=QV, leading to a wavelength of about 0.013856 nm. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the energy transitions of electrons in the lead atom to accurately determine the X-ray wavelength. The significance of the Kα line is clarified as it relates to the energy difference between electron shells.
conniechiwa
Messages
50
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The tube in a medical research X-ray unit uses lead (Z=82) as it's target. Assume the electrons are accelerated through the voltage calculated in part (b). What is the wavelength of the Kα line?

Homework Equations


KE=-13.6 ev ((Z-1)squared) / (1squared)
KE=PE=VQ
E=QV
λ=hc/E

The Attempt at a Solution


KE=-13.6 ev ((Z-1)squared) / (1squared)
KE =-13.6 ev ((82-1)squared)/ 1 squared)
KE=89229.6 ev

KE=PE=QV
89229.6=(1.602E-19 J/ev)V
V=89229.6 V

E=QV
E=(1.602E-19 C)(89229.6V)
E=1.429E-14 J

λ=hc/E
λ=((6.63E-34 J*s)(3E8 m/s))/(1.429E-14 J)
λ=1.3856E-11 m = 0.013856 nm

I'm not sure what's wrong... I correctly solved for KE and V, but I can't seem to solve for λ.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure where part b is, but think about the energies.

The accelerated electron must have enough energy to dislodge a K-electron from the lead atom.

Then another orbital electron will fall from a higher state to the spot in the K-shell, so the X-ray energy represents a difference in energy levels of atomic electrons. What's the significance of Kα?
 
Oh okay I got it now. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top