Calculatin coefficient of friction for a scooter

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing a lab experiment to determine the coefficient of friction for a razor scooter by varying velocities and distances. It is suggested that instead of proving the coefficient remains constant, the experiment should focus on measuring distance and time to calculate velocities. The conservation of energy equation is emphasized, allowing for simplification that eliminates mass from the calculations. For graphing, it is recommended to plot distance against time to derive the necessary relationships. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of clear experimental design and appropriate data representation.
besaw212
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



My task is to design a lab in which i can solve for the coefficient of friction for a razor scooter( the little medal kids one). I planned on varying velocities and distance to show that the coefficient remained constant. Does anyone see any improvements that could me made or variables that i should take into account? Thanks alot!

Homework Equations



I was going to use KE1= W2
.5mv^2=FN X u X d

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
besaw212 said:

Homework Statement

I planned on varying velocities and distance to show that the coefficient remained constant.

If you are going to solve for it, I do not believe it makes sense to show that it remains constant. The only reason I could see for having to show that it is constant is if you keep changing the surface (meaning that you are testing the surface properties and not really the scooter and one surface if you get what I am trying to say).

I suggest that you just go along measuring the distance and time to get the velocities and apply conservation of energy as you have in your relevant equations. If you simplify this equation you can just measure 't' and 'd' and plot an appropriate graph to get the coefficient of friction μ.
 
Thanks i see what your saying. Just one question about the graph. I'm having trouble deciding what should be on each axis. Would it be a KE vs D or would a mass drop out on each side and you would be left with velocity vs D ?
 
besaw212 said:
Thanks i see what your saying. Just one question about the graph. I'm having trouble deciding what should be on each axis. Would it be a KE vs D or would a mass drop out on each side and you would be left with velocity vs D ?

Well I think if you measure 'd' and 't' since acceleration will be constant, v=d/t which you can put into 0.5mv2= μFnd and get 'd' in terms of 't'. The mass will cancel out so your equation should not involve 'm' at all.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top