Calculating Absolute Potential at the Center of a Square with +Q Charges

  • Thread starter Thread starter Soaring Crane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Square
AI Thread Summary
The absolute potential at the center of a square with charges of +Q at each corner cannot be calculated by simply multiplying the potential from one corner (3V) by four. Instead, the potential must be determined by calculating the contribution from each charge individually using the formula V = kQ/r, where r is the distance from the center to each charge. Since potentials are scalar and additive, the total potential is the sum of the individual potentials from all four corners. This approach will yield a different result than the incorrect multiplication method. Understanding the proper calculation method is essential for accurate results in electrostatics.
Soaring Crane
Messages
461
Reaction score
0
The absolute potential at the exact center of a square is 3 V when a charge of +Q is located at one of the square's corners. What is the absolutue potential at the square's center when each of the other corners is also filled with a charge of +Q?

I suppose you can't just multiply 3V*4 = 12 V? What's the correct of doing this problem?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually, you can just multiply by 4. Potentials are scalar and additive.

If you want to "prove" it from first principles, you have to integrate the electric field vector along a line normal to the square and passing thru' the square's center with respect to displacement from infinity to zero. But you would end up with the same expression.
 
Last edited:


No, multiplying 3V by 4 is not the correct way to calculate the absolute potential at the center of the square when all four corners are filled with a charge of +Q. This is because the potential at a point due to multiple charges is not simply additive. Instead, you will need to use the formula for calculating potential due to multiple point charges, which is V = kQ/r, where k is the Coulomb's constant, Q is the charge, and r is the distance from the point to the charge. In this case, you will need to calculate the potential at the center of the square due to each individual charge and then add them together to get the total potential. This will give you a different value than simply multiplying by 4. I hope this helps clarify the correct way to approach this problem.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top