Calculating Aerodynamic Power for Flying a Plane

  • Thread starter Thread starter NegDee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the aerodynamic power required to fly a plane, specifically questioning the interpretation of the formula P = Mass^(3/2) divided by √S, where S represents the wing's cross-sectional area. The user provides specific figures, including a mass of 124.6 kg and a cross-section of 36 m², leading to a solution that suggests a power figure of 1389. Clarification is sought on how to arrive at the number 1389, with a suggestion that rounding or using logarithmic calculations could explain the discrepancy. The conversation also inquires whether the example is sourced from a book and its publication date. Understanding these calculations is crucial for accurately determining the power needed for flight.
NegDee
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


aerodynamics question. Power P to fly a plane.
Has P = Mass 3/2 do not know if this means square M by 3/2? that is how i take it to be then you divide this by √S which is cross section of wing.

figures are M = 124.6kg 3/2 divided by S = √ 36m Squared
solution comes up with M 1389/S 6m = 231.5kg m to power of -1
I do not know how to get to figure of 1389?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
negdee said:

Homework Statement


aerodynamics question. Power p to fly a plane.
Has p = mass 3/2 do not know if this means square m by 3/2? That is how i take it to be then you divide this by √s which is cross section of wing.

Figures are m = 124.6kg 3/2 divided by s = √ 36m squared
solution comes up with m 1389/s 6m = 231.5kg m to power of -1
i do not know how to get to figure of 1389?

(124.6)(3/2) ≈ 1391

If the author used logs with only a few decimal places, or a slide rule, to work out the answer it could have ended up as 1389. Is this example from a book? If so, what's the date of publication?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top