Calculating Alpha in BJT Common Emitter Circuit

AI Thread Summary
In a BJT common emitter circuit, two formulas for calculating alpha (α) yield different results, raising questions about the accuracy of these calculations. The first method, α = Ic/Ie, gives a value of approximately 1.011, while the second method, α = β/(β + 1), results in about 0.988, with β calculated as 85. The discrepancy arises because while Ic + Ib equals Ie, the values of Ic and Ib can introduce errors due to circuit components like capacitors and resistors. This leads to confusion about why the two calculations do not align perfectly, highlighting the potential for misleading results in practical applications. Understanding these differences is crucial for accurate analysis in lab reports.
zee824
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
i have been asked in my lab report to calculate alpha in a bjt common emmitter circuit using 2 different formulas and explain why one is misleading.β=Ic/Ib= 537.1*10^-6/6.743*10^-6≈85
α= Ic/Ie=573.1*10^-6/566.357*^-6≈1.011
α=β/β +1≈0.988
i have worked out the two values of alpha where our beta is roughly 85 however I am not sure why alpha when calculated from Ic/Ie is missleading.

i have tried to search on the internet however i have found nothing yet and same with my lecture notes.
any help is very much appreciated and i applogise if this is in the wrong section.
thanks
zee
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi zee! welcome to pf! :smile:
zee824 said:
i have been asked in my lab report to calculate alpha in a bjt common emmitter circuit using 2 different formulas and explain why one is misleading.

β=Ic/Ib= 537.1*10^-6/6.743*10^-6≈85
α= Ic/Ie=573.1*10^-6/566.357*^-6≈1.011
α=β/β +1≈0.988

it's asking why (Ic/Ib)/((Ic/Ib)+1) = Ic/(Ic + Ib) is not equal to Ic/Ie :wink:
 


tiny-tim said:
hi zee! welcome to pf! :smile:it's asking why (Ic/Ib)/((Ic/Ib)+1) = Ic/(Ic + Ib) is not equal to Ic/Ie :wink:
hi thanks for the quick reply tiny-tim however in this case they are infact equal since ic+ib=ie but I am still getting different values. i feel it is something to do with the capacitors or the configuration of the resistors that is causing a slight error but I am not sure and I am even less sure about why this is misleading
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top