Calculating Angular Momentum of a Monopole-Charge System

  • Thread starter Thread starter XieJiaLin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetism
XieJiaLin
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A magnetic monopole, if it existed, would produce a magnetic field B = gr/r^3, where g is the magnetic charge, and r is the distance from the monopole. Calculate the angular momentum of a system consisting of a monopole g and a charge e, both at rest.


The attempt at a solution

I know that the angular momentum points from the charge to the monopole with a magnitude of ge/c; however, I'm not sure how to show this. Any help starting out would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably you mean generalized angular momentum. Perhaps you need to take into account the electric field of the charge and the magnetic field of the monopole and calculate

\frac{1}{4\pi}\int\,d^3r'[\mathbf{r}'\times(\mathbf{E}\times\mathbf{B})]

using the facts that \mathbf{B}(\mathbf{r}')=-g\nabla\frac{1}{r'}

and

(\nabla'\cdot \mathbf{E})=4\pi e\delta^3(\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}')

where \mathbf{r} is the position of the charge. Integration by parts may be useful.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top