Calculating Average Acceleration in an Acceleration Test

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the average acceleration of a car in an acceleration test, the distance between two markers must be converted from kilometers to meters. The initial velocity is 5.0 m/s and the final velocity is 33.0 m/s, with the distance being 0.30 km (or 300 meters). The kinematic equation Vf² = Vi² + 2aav(d) can be rearranged to solve for average acceleration (aav). After correcting the distance unit, the calculations yield aav = 1773.3 m/s², which initially seemed incorrect due to the unit conversion oversight. Proper unit conversion is crucial for accurate results in physics problems.
CraZyFanAtiC
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey, guys just joined PF, was hoping you could help with this questions and in turn maybe i can return the favour (with the little physics knowledge I have).

Homework Statement


In a acceleration test, 2 markers are placed 0.30 km apart. The first car passed the first marked with a velocity of 5.0 m/s [E], the second passed the marker with a velocity of 33.0 m/s [E]. Calculate the Cars average acceleration.


Homework Equations


v1 = 5.0 m/s [E]
v2 = 33 m/s [E]
Delta D = 0.30 km
Aav = ?

The kinematics that i am using is Vf² = Vi² + 2aav(d)

The Attempt at a Solution


The problem i am having is rewriting the equation.
I need to rewrite this for aav.

Vf² - Vi² = Vi² + 2aav(d)

vf² - vi²/2(d) = aav

This is what i have so far, but it must be wrong i just don't see how. When i plug in the numbers..

1089 - 25/2(0.3) = aav
1064/0.6 = aav
aav = 1773.3

this can't be right can anyone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi CraZyFanAtic, welcome to PF.
Convert the distance from kilometer to meter.
 
rl.bhat said:
Hi CraZyFanAtic, welcome to PF.
Convert the distance from kilometer to meter.

O, wow do i feel stupid. First time I've seen a question like that just didn't think about it, thanks alot. Saved me a lot of time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
942
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top