Calculating bending stress on a pipe

AI Thread Summary
Design A, featuring a 7.75' bending section of 1" Schedule 40 PVC pipe, experiences less bending stress compared to Design B, which has a 5.75' bending section due to its two separate pipe segments. Design A is recognized for its durability in temporary shade structures, while Design B is easier to transport but prone to earlier failure from excessive bending. Calculating bending stress involves understanding the radius of curvature and the nonlinear stress/strain behavior of plastics, which also face issues like creep over time. Suggestions for improving Design B include using a curved center bracket instead of a rigid sleeve and employing a heat gun to shape the sleeve more accurately. The discussion emphasizes the importance of maintaining a smooth curve to prevent stress concentrations and potential buckling in the design.
dustball23
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
I wish to compare the bending stress of 2 different designs.
  • In both designs, a PVC pipe is being bent 90 degrees, fixed at each end.
  • In both designs, the pipe is fixed at both ends.
  • In both designs, the pipe is 1" (inner diameter) Schedule 40 PVC pipe, 450 PSI. Material code PVC 1120. NSF pw-G ASTM D1785 PPFA 02199101H6BX 0934.
  • In design A, the length of the pipe that bends is 7.75'. (The actual pipe is 10' long but the ends will not bend much for two different reasons. The one end slides over a 1' pole to hold it in place. The other end slides 1.25' into a larger pipe. So the middle 7.75' must bend 90 degrees.
  • In design B, the 10' pipe is cut in half, and a 2' rigid outer sleeve joins them in the middle. So the part that bends (the 7.75' from the original design) is now only 5.75' - but really two separate sections of 2.875' each.
Untitled-5.png


Design A will last longer because there is less bending stress. Design A is a well known and well-tested design for temporary shade structures in the desert. Design B is easier to transport because the 10' pipes are cut in half, but will fail earlier because the pipes will get bent too much too early. How much additional bending stress is happening? (Typically, these structures are used 10 days a year, and will be reused every year until the pipes get too bent.)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Since you know the shape, you can measure or calculate the radius of curvature. From that, and the diameter of the pipe, you can calculate the bending strain. The strain equals (half the pipe diameter) / (radius of curvature). The stress can be calculated from the strain. Good search term to learn more: bending moment radius of curvature.

HOWEVER, the above assumes that the material has a linear stress / strain curve. Plastics typically do not have linear stress / strain curves. The strain can be calculated exactly, while the stress is a function of the (nonlinear) stress / strain curve plus time due to creep.

dustball23 said:
Typically, these structures are used 10 days a year, and will be reused every year until the pipes get too bent.

Plastics are also subject to creep. If the pipes are taking a permanent bend, that is the result of creep. Creep gets worse with increasing stress. Good search terms to learn more: plastics creep. It is difficult to predict life when the failure mode is due to creep because you need specific creep curves for your specific material. Also, creep curves are typically plotted against stress, while you have a constant strain design. The stress decreases with time, while the strain stays the same.

Is it practical to change Design B such that the center sleeve is replaced with a center bracket curved to the same radius as Design A? You would need U-bolts or something to pull the ends of the pipe into place. The result would have the exact same pipe curvature as Design A.
 
  • Like
Likes dustball23
All very interesting points. That makes sense how the stress decreases with time (as the plastic creeps) and I was thinking the same thing. Maybe having bent pipes isn't so bad, since each year they will simply take more of a shape of the final structure anyway.

I'm not sure I have have the resources to create a precisely curved sleeve. Maybe I could take a heat gun, warm the sleeve, and bend it by hand to a best approximation of the curve. I'm also starting to doubt the curve need to be that long, I don't know why 2' was chosen by the designer of Design B. (My gut feeling is that by using too short of a piece - say a standard PVC coupler of a few inches - the stress would be too much and the design would buckle in that place.)
 
dustball23 said:
My gut feeling is that by using too short of a piece - say a standard PVC coupler of a few inches - the stress would be too much and the design would buckle in that place.
Your gut feeling is correct. If the fit to the sleeve is loose, then the pipe and the sleeve will be at angles instead of a smooth curve.

I think that the 2 foot length is about right. Your idea of a heat gun is good, and it is certainly easy enough to try. I suggest cutting a piece of wood to the desired curve to use as a bending template.

Here's another idea:
P8060022.JPG

Take a piece of wood about 1.5" thick and 2 feet long. Trace a piece of bent pipe to get the curve correct, cut the curve, then carve out a groove. Clamp the pipes in place with a pair of U-bolts. If you cannot find the right size U-bolts, just buy a piece of 1/4" threaded rod, cut to length, and bend into a U.
 
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
I need some assistance with calculating hp requirements for moving a load. - The 4000lb load is resting on ball bearing rails so friction is effectively zero and will be covered by my added power contingencies. Load: 4000lbs Distance to travel: 10 meters. Time to Travel: 7.5 seconds Need to accelerate the load from a stop to a nominal speed then decelerate coming to a stop. My power delivery method will be a gearmotor driving a gear rack. - I suspect the pinion gear to be about 3-4in in...

Similar threads

Back
Top