Calculating Center of Mass for a System of Spherical Masses on the x-axis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the center of mass for a system of three spherical masses positioned on the x-axis. The correct formula for the center of mass is provided, which includes all three masses and their respective positions. A participant initially miscalculates the center of mass, suggesting an incorrect answer of 2 units. Clarification is made that the answer should be expressed in meters, emphasizing the importance of unit consistency in calculations. Ultimately, the correct approach and formula are confirmed for determining the center of mass accurately.
psruler
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi, here is the problem:

Imagine three spherical masses all fixed on the x-axis: mass 5M at the origin, mass 2M at x =+12.0 units, and mass M at x = -8.0 units, all connected by a rigid rod whose mass can be ignored. At what position along the x-axis is the center of mass of the system located?

is this the correct equation? if so, i don't know where to plug in the numbers.
x = (m1x1 + m2x2)/ m1+m2

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes.

Take a guess. You got 2 sets of values in the given and two sets of x and m in your equation. What makes sense?

cookiemonster
 
i got 2units as the answer. is that correct?
 
Oops.

You got 3 sets of values and 3 pairs of x and m. Your formula should be

\bar{x} = \frac{m_1x_1 + m_2x_2 + m_3x_3}{m_1 + m_2 + m_2}

Sorry. I didn't catch that third value the first time.

2 "units" is not the correct answer. You should be getting something in units of meters.

cookiemonster
 
cookiemonster said:
2 "units" is not the correct answer. You should be getting something in units of meters.
Actually the answer is 2 "units". Where does it say we are working within the SI system, or any other unit system for that matter?
 
I could have sworn I read "meters" in that post last night! I must have been tired. =\

cookiemonster
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top