Calculating Charge of Radon Nucleus

  • Thread starter Thread starter poteat86
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Nucleus
AI Thread Summary
The total charge of a radon nucleus, which contains 86 protons, is positive due to the protons' positive charge. The charge can be calculated by multiplying the number of protons (86) by the charge of a single proton, approximately +1.6 x 10^-19 C. It’s important to remember that while electrons have a negative charge, they are not part of the nucleus and do not factor into this calculation. Rounding issues or unit misunderstandings may lead to incorrect answers, so clarity on the required units is essential. Ultimately, the correct charge of the radon nucleus is +1.376 x 10^-17 C.
poteat86
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi, this problem is killing me.

What is the total charge of the radon nucleus? (The neutral radon atom has 86 electrons.)

The units is in Coulombs so I figured since they were asking for the charge of just the nucleus then it would be 86 protons times -1.6x10^-19 C. But that didn't work, I've tried every answer I can think of but it isn't working. (its like an online homework thing...i have only a few tries left and i need this answer to continue the rest) Please please help! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
protons have a positive charge?
 
yes...protons are positive and electrons are negative but electrons aren't in the nucleus so that's why i was using protons
 
In your original post you are saying the proton charge is negative... make sure you are putting in a positive number. Could it be a rounding issue? Since the exact charge of the electron is: −1.602 176 53(14) × 10−19 C thus making the proton have charge the opposite of that? Is your answer supposed to be in Coulombs? or in some other unit system?
 
thanks for your help, i finally got it!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top