Calculating Complex Integrals using Cauchy Formula on a Circular Path | z = 4

player1_1_1
Messages
112
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


\oint_{L} \frac{ \mbox{d} z}{ z(z+3) } and L:|z|=4

The Attempt at a Solution


what is assumption, is it oriented positive or negative? and Cauchy formula, can it be done like this?
\frac{ 1 }{ 3 } \left( \oint_{L} \frac{ \mbox{d} z}{ z } - \oint_{L} \frac{ \mbox{d} z}{ z+3 } \right)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If nothing else is said, the integral is assumed to be in the positive orientation, counter-clockwise.
Yes, your partial fraction reduction is correct and the integral can be done in that way. Letting z= e^{i\theta} in the first integral and z= 3+ e^{i\theta} in the second will give very simple integrals, giving the residues at z= 0 and z= 3.
 
thanks for answer, I got 0, is it possible? and please tell me why residue in 3, not -3?
 
Last edited:
up.,
 
player1_1_1 said:
thanks for answer, I got 0, is it possible? and please tell me why residue in 3, not -3?

Sure the pole is at -3. And 0 is right. In fact, it's generally true that if f(z) is a polynomial of degree greater than 1 then the integral is zero around a contour that encloses all of the poles.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top