Calculating dA/dB ratio for horizontal log?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the dA/dB ratio for a horizontal log suspended by two steel wires of different initial lengths. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the deflection, defined as the change in length of the wires under load. It is clarified that despite wire B being longer initially, both wires must reach the same length when the log is horizontal, indicating that wire B has also undergone some change in length. The need for a free body diagram is highlighted to analyze the forces and ensure static equilibrium. Overall, the conversation underscores the complexities of tension and deflection in the context of the problem.
rockchalk1312
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
In the figure, a 105 kg uniform log hangs by two steel wires, A and B, both of radius 1.25 mm. Initially, wire A was 2.50 m long and 1.80 mm shorter than wire B. The log is now horizontal. Young's modulus for steel is 2.00 × 1011 N/m2. What is the ratio dA/dB?


I'm honestly at a loss for how to even approach this problem. Any help is appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Draw a free body diagram of the log suspended by the two wires. Wire A was shorter than Wire B when no load was applied. Both wires are now the same length. Figure out the stresses and change in lengths of the two wires such that they both have equal length and the log is in static equilibrium. Then figure out the ratio of the deflection of wire A to the deflection of wire B.
 
SteamKing said:
Then figure out the ratio of the deflection of wire A to the deflection of wire B.

What exactly do you mean by deflection? Is it just asking for the ratio of the change in length of A to B?

B doesn't change in length so that would make the ratio invalid...
 
deflection = change of length of the wire.

Although the problem states the log is horizontal after being suspended, and this implies that the two wires are the same length after suspending the log, this does not mean that wire B, originally the longer wire, has not undergone some change in length. If wire B were the same length before and after the log was suspended, this would imply that there is no tension in wire B and that wire A thus is supporting the log all by itself.
 
rockchalk1312 said:
In the figure,
Pls describe the figure. Are the wires vertical and attached at the same level at the top, or maybe attached at a common point?
I feel there must be something I'm missing. I don't see any reason, in the info given so far, that the wires would be subject to different loads, so it's hard to understand why the shorter one has undergone the greater extension. Maybe they're vertical but attached at different heights from the ground (specifically, B more than 1.8mm above A).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top