Calculating Density of Aluminium Using Debye Theory

AI Thread Summary
The density of aluminum was calculated using Debye theory, yielding an atom density of 2.24E28 m^-3 at 600K, resulting in an estimated density of 1000 kg m^-3. This estimate significantly deviates from the true density of 2700 kg m^-3. The discrepancy arises because the Debye model does not account for the strong interatomic forces that enhance atomic packing density. These forces contribute additional mass, leading to a higher true density than predicted. Understanding the limitations of the Debye model is crucial for accurate density calculations in materials.
alfredbester
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
I've calculates the density of aluminium using the debye theory.
I found The atom density n = 2.24E28 m^-3 at 600k (assumed to be the same as at room temperature).
Therefore the density is just the molecular mass m (m(grams) = (79amu / Avogadros number), multiplied by the atom density. Which I found to be 1000 kg m^-3.
I'm asked to compared to this with a true value of 2700 Kg m^-3.

My estimate just assumes all the mass is the atoms, but I'm not sure why the discrepancy is so large. I thought the majority of the mass of a solid was in the atoms.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The discrepancy is due to the fact that the Debye model does not take into account the strong interatomic forces that exist in materials. These interatomic forces cause atoms to be packed more densely than what would be expected from a simple atom density calculation. The additional mass comes from these interatomic forces and the accompanying increased atomic packing density. This increased mass results in a higher true value than what was estimated using the Debye model.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top