Calculating Earth's Temperature with Sirius as Sun

Coren
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Trying to answer the question of "what would happen if Sirius take the place of the Sun", I've begin to try to calculate the average temperature of Earth in function of time for any incident flux (and therefore, the average temperature today), knowing the real average temperature of Earth and that 4'6Gy later it has reached it from zero, considering the star like a black body.


Homework Equations



Luminosity is given by:

L=a·4·pi·sigma·R^2·T^4 W

Where "R" is radius of the body, "T" its temperature, "sigma" the Stephan-Boltzmann constant and "a" is the absortivity of the body.

Flux is given by:

F=L/(4·pi·d^2) W/m^2

With "d" the distance where you want to calculate the flux.

Temperature in a body is:

T=c·Q/M K

Where "c" is the calorific capability of the body, "Q" is the total energy of the body, excluding mechanic ("heat" I think is how you call in english), and M is the mass of the body.

The Attempt at a Solution



In this problem, we have that Q is the absorbed energy minus the emited energy:

Q=Qabs-Qem

If Sun (or the star) is a black body, we have that (subindex s and e means "star" and "Earth"):

Qabs=Fs·pi·Re^2·a·t ; t=time

Fs=Ls/4·pi·d^2 ; Ls=4·pi·sigma·Rs^2·Ts^4

Qem=Le·t ; Le=4·pi·sigma·Re^2·Te^4

We will consider flux of the star and product with the effective section of the Earth and with absortibity like a constant, having:

Qabs=Fabs·t

Because of there are constants too in Qem, we will write it like:

Qem=A·Te^4·t where A=4·pi·sigma·Re^2

Now, with the hipotesis of calorific capability constant throught time, we have:

Te=c·(Qabs-Qem)/Me

So then:

dTe/dt=c·(Fabs-4·A·Te^3·(dTe/dt)·t-A·Te^4)/M

Making some algebra:

dTe/dt=c·(Fa-ATe^4)/(Me+c·4·A·Te^3·t)

Leads to a differential equation that I'm unable to solve. In adition I don't know if my logic is correct.

¿Can you help me?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I've been thinking, and I've found that the original problem is much easier.

If we have that:

Pabs=Fs·pi·Re^2·(1-A) where A is the Albedo Bond, and 1-A=absortibity

Pabs=Ls·Re^2·(1-A)/(4·d^2)

Pem=4·pi·sigma·Re^2·Te^4

In equilibrium: Pabs=Pem so..

Te=[Ls·(1-A)/(sigma·pi·16·d^2)]^0'25

Knowing that, with Ls the luminosity of Sun, Te is 253 K we can have A...

Lsun=3'65·10^26 W

sigma=5'67·10^-8 W/(m^2·K^4)

d=1'49598·10^11 m

We have:

A=0'28.

With that, now we could have the temperature if Sirius was here.

Lsirius=1'4359·10^28

Then, Te=634 K (381 degrees more...).

But I still want to know what is the solution of the other equation, and if it was well done.
 
I'm a bit confused about the phrasing of the question. It is something like.. plug in the luminosity of Sirius in place of the Sun... how much does the equilibrium temperature of Earth change (to an approximation)?

If so, you seem to have done the right thing. One thing to be careful about is that the flux from the star only strikes half the of the surface of the Earth, while the Earth will emit radiation (blackbody assumption) from its whole surface area. These are just factors of two though...

If I follow your logic correctly, you're just leaving the time dependence in there. And it looks ok to me (not completely checking the details). One promising detail is that if you take the long time limit on your differential equation, the temperature does level off somewhere (so you do have an equilibrium situation, eventually, according to your equations). It doesn't look pleasant to solve completely though. Could perhaps do it numerically -- but I don't know what you'd insert for the specific heat of Earth.
 
aiy1tm said:
I'm a bit confused about the phrasing of the question. It is something like.. plug in the luminosity of Sirius in place of the Sun... how much does the equilibrium temperature of Earth change (to an approximation)?

Yes, that was the original idea. But I thought it would be interesting too the fact of solve the "time for equillibrium".

aiy1tm said:
If so, you seem to have done the right thing. One thing to be careful about is that the flux from the star only strikes half the of the surface of the Earth, while the Earth will emit radiation (blackbody assumption) from its whole surface area. These are just factors of two though...

I did, the surface I took for absortion was Sa=pi·Re^2 (effective section, like a disk). And the surface for emision Se=4·pi·Re^2.

aiy1tm said:
If I follow your logic correctly, you're just leaving the time dependence in there. And it looks ok to me (not completely checking the details). One promising detail is that if you take the long time limit on your differential equation, the temperature does level off somewhere (so you do have an equilibrium situation, eventually, according to your equations). It doesn't look pleasant to solve completely though. Could perhaps do it numerically -- but I don't know what you'd insert for the specific heat of Earth.

I tought that knowing the temperature for the flux of Sun (Te today), there would be enought data to solve the specific heat. Perhaps with numerical methods as you just suggested.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top