Calculating Electric Field at a Point from Multiple Charges

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the electric field at a point generated by two charges, q1 and q2, the superposition principle is applied, using the vectors r1 and r2 to represent the positions of the charges relative to the point of interest. The correct formula involves unit vectors, and the contributions from both charges must be calculated separately, ensuring that the charge values are accurately represented in the equations. When evaluating the electric field, it's important to factor out constants and avoid overly complex expressions that include unnecessary variables. Additionally, when dealing with linear charge distributions, the symmetry of the setup can simplify calculations, but care must be taken to account for all components of the electric field. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly applying vector principles and understanding charge distributions in electric field calculations.
yevi
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
I want to find an electric field in a point (x,y,z) generated by 2 charges:
q1 = q, and q2=2q, q1’s position = (1,2,3) and q2’s position = (4,5,6),

I tried to solve it by using superposition principle, adding the E of each charge to point x,y,z, I am doing something wrong probably with vectors calculation.

Please explain.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Where in the calculation are you getting stuck? I'm not going to be able to give you any decent help if you don't show some work.
 
well,
E = 1/[4*Pi*epsilon0] * (q/r1^2 * r1 + q/r2^2 * r2)
r1 and r2 vectors
 
r1=(x-1,y-2,z-3)
r2=(x-4,y-5,z-6)

after that and calculating all constants i get stuck.
 
yevi said:
well,
E = 1/[4*Pi*epsilon0] * (q/r1^2 * r1 + q/r2^2 * r2)
r1 and r2 vectors

The vectors should be unit vectors...
 
yes unit vector,
I get: r1/|r1| but this doesn’t give me anything
 
If it should be like this:

E[x] = E1*(1/sqrt(14),0,0)+E2..

?
Thanks.
 
Yeah, how is the answer supposed to look? How do you know your answer is wrong?
 
I don't know the answer, but my answer has form with a lot of x,y and z variables.
 
  • #10
yevi said:
well,
E = 1/[4*Pi*epsilon0] * (q/r1^2 * r1 + q/r2^2 * r2)
r1 and r2 vectors

There should be 2q in the numerator or r2^2.
 
  • #11
well,
E = 1/[4*Pi*epsilon0] * (q/r1^2 * r1/|r1| + q/r2^2 * r2/|r2|)
r1 and r2 vectors

did you solve this one?
You would get lots of x,y,z vars, if you do

yea, changing to q2=2q should give the answer..
 
  • #12
Yes, 2q.

I have a follow up question, to find field in (10,10,10) where q1=10^-6 q2=2*10^-6
and the answer for that is 10^-9K(21.09x’+17.76y’+14.43z’)

My answer and the point (10,10,10) doesn’t give this result.
 
  • #13
rootX,
yes I get a mess of x,y and z.
 
  • #14
I am doing something wrong with vectors, it's shouldn't be complicated...
 
  • #15
Just leave it as the sum of the two fields... also you can factor out \frac{q}{({r_1^2})^{3/2}} for the first part... and \frac{q}{({r_2^2})^{3/2}} for the second part...

so all the messy stuff in the denominator can get factored out of the vectors... don't actually multiply out (x-a)^2 + (y-b)^2... etc.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
I get
kq (0.123,1.17798..)
I guess I also messed up something..
 
  • #17
ok, I am 55% sure that this answer is wrong: 10^-9K(21.09x’+17.76y’+14.43z’)

here's what I got from maxima:
kq(0.14227258171877 , 0.20662308551546 , 0.270973589312)
 
  • #18
I'm getting the answer that is given: 10^-9K(21.09x’+17.76y’+14.43z’)
 
Last edited:
  • #19
learningphysics,
can you please give your solution?
 
  • #20
yevi said:
learningphysics,
can you please give your solution?

Basically I got:

kq*[\frac{(9,8,7)}{{194}^{3/2}} + 2*\frac{(6,5,4)}{{77}^{3/2}}]

this evaluates to the given answer.
 
Last edited:
  • #21
lol
I was doing [sqrt(194)]^3/2 and [sqrt(77)]^3/2
Thanks
 
  • #22
and I was using (1,2,3) for (9,8,4) and (4,5,6) for..
 
  • #23
Another related question:

There are 2 linear charges distributed on y and x axis, segments lengths 0<=x<=l and 0<=y<=l.
Density of the charges is not uniformed: gamma(x)=bx and gamma(y)=by.
Need to fine E(0,0,z)

I tried to do following:

Because those 2 segments lay on axis x and axis y the needed Electric field is on axis z.
And because of symmetric I can calculate the contribution of one segments and contribution of the second will be the same.

So I need to find dE and then dE_z.

dE= \frac{kdq}{r^2}

dE_z= \frac{kdq}{r^2} sin (\alpha)

r^2 = \sqrt{z^2+l^2}

Am I doing right so far?
 
  • #24
You meant:

r=\sqrt{z^2+l^2}

Yes, what you've described will give you the field for one segment at the point z along the z-axis... then you can double it to get the field along the z-axis...

But you also need another component of the field at (0,0,z)
 
  • #25
What do you mean by another component?
 
  • #26
another question how do I convert the dq?

Is it bl?
 
  • #27
yevi said:
another question how do I convert the dq?

Is it bl?

dq would be bxdx or bydy
 
  • #28
yevi said:
What do you mean by another component?

There is a component that's parallel to the line y=x...

If the segments extend to the negative axes this component wouldn't be there... but since they only go from 0 to L... not -L to L... another component exists...

Imagine if we were dealing with equal point charges... one located at (L,0,0)... another at (0,L,0)... and you wanted the field at (0,0,0)... see the direction of the field? that's the direction of this extra component.
 
Last edited:
  • #29
thanks
 
  • #30
Hmm.

The given answer for this is: E_z=2kb(\frac{z}{|z|}-\frac{z}{\sqrt{z^2+l^2}})

But I don't get it right!

My integral from above is

\int\frac{2kbx}{z^2+l^2}sin(\alpha)dx

where I substitute sin(\alpha)=\frac{z}{\sqrt{z^2+l^2}}
 
  • #31
You should be using z^2 + x^2... L should only be in the limits of your integral...

Is E_z the only answer given in the back?
 
  • #32
yes the only answer, this is what needed i guess.

Why do you ask? is it wrong?
 
  • #33
yevi said:
yes the only answer, this is what needed i guess.

Why do you ask? is it wrong?

No, well that's the z-component... that doesn't include the other component... maybe I misunderstood the problem somehow... or maybe they left out that component... not sure...

Did they ask for the total field at (0,0,z), or just the z-component of the field at (0,0,z) ?
 
  • #34
Sorry, just the Z.

Thanks, I got it :) .
 
  • #35
yevi said:
Sorry, just the Z.

Thanks, I got it :) .

Ah. cool. :smile:
 
Back
Top