Calculating Electric Force on q3 in Meters: A Superposition Approach

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric force on charge q3 using the superposition principle, with charges q1, q2, and q3 located at specified coordinates. The user initially calculated the forces in the x and y components but received incorrect results from the mastering physics platform. Key points include the correct distances r13 and r23, which were clarified as 2.2m and 2m respectively, and the importance of using appropriate significant figures in calculations. The user identified a rounding error in their calculations, particularly in the y-component force, which contributed to the discrepancy. Accurate calculations and attention to detail in significant figures are crucial for successful online homework submissions.
veevee
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
(x,y) axis in meters

q1=60microC (0,1)
q2=-34microC (2,0)
q3=13microC (2,2)

Fx3=? Fy3=?

i used superposition
F(net on 3)=F13+F23

broke it down into x and y components
Fx=(kq1q3/r13^2)(x/r13)
Fy=(kq1q3/r13^2)(y/r13) - (kq2q3/r23^2)

plugging in the numbers i got
Fx=1.3
Fy=-0.4

mastering physics says its wrong, and I can't seem to figure out where I went wrong...any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What did you use for r13, r23, x, and y ?

Be careful regarding the direction of the forces.
 
r13=sqrt(x2+y2)=sqrt(4+1)=2.2m

r23=2m

x=2
y=1
 
It might be simply too much round-off error.

(sqrt(5))2 = 5

2.22 = 4.84
 
the problem was i was entering 1 sig fig not 2 for Fy lol...online homework submissions...they'll waste your time for the simplest reasons..thanks though :)))
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top