Trouble with electric force question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the electric force vector on charge q3 due to charges q1 and q2, using the formula F=(kq1q2)/r^2*\hat{r}. The user initially calculated the distances r for both charges incorrectly, leading to an erroneous resultant force vector of 0.367\hat{i}-0.412\hat{j}. Upon review, it was suggested to double-check the distance calculation for q1, which is critical for accurate force vector determination.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law for electric forces
  • Familiarity with vector addition in physics
  • Knowledge of coordinate geometry for distance calculations
  • Proficiency in using unit vectors in force calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Coulomb's Law and its application in electric force calculations
  • Practice vector addition with multiple forces in physics problems
  • Study coordinate geometry to accurately determine distances between points
  • Learn about unit vectors and their role in representing force directions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone seeking to improve their understanding of electric force calculations and vector analysis.

con31773
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm having a little trouble with an electric force question I have been working on. It seems simple, but my answer keeps coming out incorrect. Using the graph, deduce the electric force vector on charge q3 by q1/2. In case it is not clear, q3 lies on point (2,2)
Graph.jpg


Homework Equations



F=(kq1q2)/r^2*[itex]\hat{r}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay, well since electric force vectors simply add to give resultant force I can deduced the individual vectors and sum, as such.

F(1/3)=(kq1q3)/r^2*[itex]\hat{r}[/itex](1/3)

and the same applies to the second charge

F(2/3)=(kq3q2)/r^2*[itex]\hat{r}[/itex](2/3)

then I deduced r for both. Simply being 2 for q(2/3), and 5 for q(1/3) (from pythagoras)
Then, the unit vectors, as (2[itex]\hat{i}[/itex]+[itex]\hat{j}[/itex])/5 for q(1/3)
and [itex]\hat{j}[/itex] for q(2/3)

Put it together I got
F(1/3)=((kq1q3)/25)(2[itex]\hat{i}[/itex]+[itex]\hat{j}[/itex])

F(2/3)=((kq2q3)/4)[itex]\hat{j}[/itex]

Evaluate and sum, I got, 0.367[itex]\hat{i}[/itex]-0.412[itex]\hat{j}[/itex]

which of course is not correct. I'm sure there is a mistake in there but can not find it. Would be greatful for some fresh eyes to tell me where.

Thank you in advance. :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello con31772 and welcome to PF!

con31773 said:
then I deduced r for both. Simply being 2 for q(2/3), and 5 for q(1/3)

Oops. Check what you got for r for q(1/3).
 
Oops. Check what you got for r for q(1/3)

Haha, thanks very much. Could not find my mistake at all.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K