Calculating Electric Potential for a Wire with Linear Charge Density?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electric potential at the center of a semicircular wire with a linear charge density, λ. The potential from the semicircle is given by the formula V = KQ/R, but the challenge lies in determining the potential from the two straight wire segments. To address this, a small element dx is considered, where the charge on this segment is λ*dx, and the potential contribution is calculated as dV = K*λ*dx/(R + x). Integration is suggested between the limits x = R to x = (2R + R) to find the total potential from one straight piece, which is then doubled for both segments. The discussion concludes with an expression of gratitude for the assistance received.
mjolnir80
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


the wire in the image below has a linear charge density \lambda . what is the electric potential at the center of the semicircle?
http://img18.imageshack.us/img18/5139/physicsproblem.jpg

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


i know that the potential from the semi circle is V=KQ/R
but I am having a little trouble figuring out how to calculate the potential from the other 2R pieces of wire.
can someone help me out here :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider a small element dx at a distance x from the center P on either 2R piece. Charge on this piece is lambda*dx. Potential due to this piece dV = K*lambda*dx/( R + x ). To find the potential due one piece find the integration between the limits x = R to x = (2R + R). Then double it to get the total potential due to two straight pieces.
 
Last edited:
rl.bhat said:
Consider a small element dx at a distance x from the center P on either 2R piece. Charge on this piece is lambda*dx. Potential due to this piece dV = K*lambda*dx/( R + x ). To find the potential due one piece find the integration between the limits x = R to x = (2R + R). Then double it to get the total potential due to two straight pieces.

thanks allot for the help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top