Calculating equilibrant in regular hexagon

  • Thread starter Thread starter sareba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hexagon Regular
AI Thread Summary
In a regular hexagon with forces acting along its sides, the calculation of the equilibrant requires understanding vector addition, which is not simply additive for non-parallel vectors. The user initially miscalculated the relationships between the forces, assuming that AB + BC equaled AC without considering their angles. Clarifications emphasized the need for accurate vector representation and component resolution using sine and cosine functions. Ultimately, the correct equilibrant was determined to be 8.7 N at an angle of 46.7° to BA. The discussion highlights the importance of proper vector analysis in solving force equilibrium problems.
sareba
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In a regular hexagon, ABCDEF, forces of magnitude 2N, 4N, 3N and 2N act along the lines AB, AC, AD and AF respectively. Find the equilbrant of the given forces and verify that is equal and opposite to their resultant.



The Attempt at a Solution


I realized that AB + BC is equal to AC, which is 4N, so BC should be 2N and AC + CD is equal to AD, which is equal to 3N, so CD should be equal to -1N? but also since AC is parallel to and twice as much as BC it should be 4N but it is 3N so which of my assumption is wrong? Also resolving didnt get me the right answer maybe i didnt do it right.

The answer is 8.7 N at 46.7° to BA.
P.S I am new to this forum so go easy if i didnt post it right or anything. :D
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I realized that AB + BC is equal to AC, which is 4N, so BC should be 2N

No. AB and BC are at different angles so it's not simply a matter of AB + BC = AC. The only way 2 + 2 = 4 in vector addition is if the two vectors are parallel and they aren't.

I make the drawing something like this..
 

Attachments

  • Hexagon.jpg
    Hexagon.jpg
    14 KB · Views: 716
hi sareba! :smile:
sareba said:
I realized that AB + BC is equal to AC, which is 4N, so BC should be 2N and AC + CD is equal to AD, which is equal to 3N, so CD should be equal to -1N? but also since AC is parallel to and twice as much as BC it should be 4N but it is 3N so which of my assumption is wrong? Also resolving didnt get me the right answer maybe i didnt do it right.

to be honest, i don't understand any of this …

you seem to picturing it the wrong way :confused:

look at CWatters' :smile: excellent diagram, and start again

(you'll probably have to add the components, using sin and cos :wink:)
 
I think I see his problem. If you mistakenly draw the vector acting in the direction AB the full length of the side AB (and others likewise) then easy to confuse the hexagon with a vector head-to-tail diagram.

For example this diagram is totally incorrect but it might fool you into thinking that AB+BC=AC. However it's not to scale. If the sides were 2 units long then AC would not be 4 units long nor would AD be 3 units long.
 

Attachments

  • Hexagon1.jpg
    Hexagon1.jpg
    13.1 KB · Views: 594
Oh... I understand now! *facepalm* I must be so dumb. Anyway thanks a lot guys! Really impressed. :approve:
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top