Calculating Equivalent Resistance in Coated Substrate Circuits

AI Thread Summary
In a circuit where a poorly conductive substrate material is coated with a highly conductive material, the arrangement can be viewed as having multiple paths for electricity flow. The resistances of the coatings and substrate can be considered in parallel, but calculating the equivalent resistance is complex and depends on the specific dimensions and connections of the materials. Coating a poor conductor with a highly conductive material does not change the intrinsic resistivity of the substrate; it merely provides alternative paths for current flow. The concept of effective resistivity for a composite material is not applicable, as resistivity is defined for homogeneous materials. Understanding the arrangement and properties of each layer is crucial for accurate resistance calculations.
Tanveer Saleh
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello I have a question to ask you. Your help will be highly appreciated. Kindly refer to a scenario where a substrate material ‘B’ is coated both side with a coating material ‘A’. The whole thing is then connected to a voltage source. Here B is poorly conductive and A is highly conductive.


If I want to apply Ohm’s law in the above circuit can I assume that there are 3 resistance in parallel (Namely top coating Ra,middle substrateRb,bottom coatingRa)?

And can I further calculate the Req by combining these 3 resistance?

If so then can we conclude that effective electrical resistance can be reduced if it is coated with high conductive material?

How do I calculate the effective resistivity (of the combined coated material)?

Your help would be highly appreciated. Thanks a lot in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure I understand your description.
It sounds like a simple 'sandwich' where the electricity is set to flow top-to-bottom.

i.e. in - bread - lettuce - bread - out

In which case, the resistances are in series not parallel and I can't make any sense of the rest of the question.
 
Hello AJ Bentley,
Thanks for the reply.
pls see the attached file for the circuit config.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
The final resistance of such an arrangement would depend very strongly on the precise size and shape of each part and on exactly how the connections are made to it.

Very roughly, you can say that there are three parallel paths for the electricity, two passing through the outside materials (All material A) and one passing through the middle (material A then B then A again). But as I said, to calculate resistance values for each path using resistivity would be complicated.

To answer your second question: Putting conductive material round a poor conductor does not change it's intrinsic resistivity, it simply provides a short circuit.
You can't talk about the resistivity of a composite. The concept doesn't make sense in that context. It is a value given to homogeneous materials to allow resistance to be calculated for different shapes and sizes. You could calculate a number certainly - but the number would have no value.
It's like talking about the density of 'water with lumps of lead in it'.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top