Calculating Force R: Distributed Load Homework

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force R from a distributed load, specifically addressing the use of the value "800 N/m." The calculation provided in the solution involves breaking the trapezoidal load into a constant and a triangular load, ultimately arriving at R = 360 N. Some participants argue that the average distributed load method is simpler, yielding the same result by multiplying the average load of 600 N/m by the member's length. The conversation critiques the complexity of the original method while confirming the final force R value remains consistent at 360 N. The thread highlights differing approaches to solving the problem while emphasizing the importance of clarity in calculations.
princejan7
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://postimg.org/image/7vpxry28t/


Can someone explain how they calculated the force R representing the distributed load?
Did they even make use of the value "800N/m" from the question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The calculation for R is included in the solution section. You don't need to use the 800 N/m unless you calculated the value of R using the formula for the area of a trapezoid:

R = (0.6/2)*(400 + 800) = 360 N

I think they are trying to show how to break up a trapezoidal load into a constant distributed load and a triangular load.
 
Last edited:
princejan7 said:

Homework Statement



http://postimg.org/image/7vpxry28t/



Can someone explain how they calculated the force R representing the distributed load?
Did they even make use of the value "800N/m" from the question?
Yes, they used the 800, but they obtained the force R result a stupid (IMHO) way. The way I would have done it would have been to note that the average distributed load over the length of the member is 600 N/m. If we multiply that by the length of the member (0.6), we get 360 N. They did something like the following: the minimum distributed load over the length of the member is 400 N/m, so this contributes 400 (0.6) = 240N. Over and above that, the remainder of the load varies from 0 at the left end to 400 at the right end (400 to 800, minus the 400 already accounted for). The average of this excess is (0+400)/2 = 200. The load contribution of this excess is (400/2)(0.6)=120N. The total load R is again 360 N. As I said, their method is kinda stupid.

Chet
 
thanks
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top