Calculating Force to Pull Copper Ball Upward

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the force required to pull a copper ball upward through a fluid at a constant speed, the drag force is proportional to speed, with a constant of 0.950 N-s/m. The resistive force is calculated using the equation R = -bv, resulting in a value of -0.0855 Newtons. The total force equation is set up as the sum of the weight of the ball and the resistive force equaling the pull force. The weight of the ball must be determined using its radius to find its mass, which is essential for the calculation. The correct units for the proportionality constant are confirmed as N-s/m, ensuring accurate force calculations.
anneseanandy
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I need to calculate the force required to pull a copper ball radius 2.00cm upward through a fluid at the constant speed 9.00cm/s. The drag forse is to be proportional to the speed, with proportionality constant .950kg/s. Ignore any boyant force.

What I did so far was figure out the resistive force using the equation: R=-bv, where b= .950kg/s and v= .09m/s
So that gives me -.0855Newtons.

My equation set up so far is:
SumYForces = mg+ Resitive force= Pull Force
and then from there I have no clue, the answer in the back of the book is 3.01 N, but I just can't seem to get it. Thanks -anne
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about the weight of the ball?

PS: the unit of that proportionality constant is not kg/s. It must be N-s/m so that when you multiply it by m/s you end up with N.
 
Last edited:
the weird thing is they give no mass, and that's what they give as the proportional constant.
 
You are given the radius of the ball. From that, with a little effort, you can find the mass (and then the weight).

As to the unit of the constant, you're right. Sorry, I guess I was too tired last night. (1kg/s)*(1m/s)=1(kg-m/s^2)=1N
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top