Calculating Forces in Gate Frame Members: Am I on the Right Track?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on designing a gate frame and calculating the forces within its members. The original poster is using methods of sections and joints but finds them ineffective, opting instead to draw free body diagrams (FBD) for each member to determine maximum bending moments and select appropriate square tube sizes. Suggestions include using 1/2" square mild steel tubing, with a recommendation to increase to 1" if higher loads are anticipated. There is also advice to consider axial loads and perform a Mohr analysis for a comprehensive understanding of stresses. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately assessing the load distribution, particularly at hinge points.
VooDoo
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

Trying to design a simple gate for the side of our house and in order to select the size of the square tube for the frame, I need to calculate the forces in the members of the frame.

I have tried the method of sections and joints, however both do not seem to work.

My next approach is to draw a fbd for each member then work out what the maximum bending moment is and then select a sqaure tube size based on that. If any tubes are in compression I will calculate buckling.

Just want to know if I am going down the correct path?
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    4.8 KB · Views: 576
Engineering news on Phys.org
I must say that I honestly wonder sometimes if people over-think things. Are you trying to bar access to your home from a Jehovah's Witness or a water buffalo? It makes a tad bit of difference as to what structural integrity is needed. (And the buffalo is easier to reason with.)
As a good compromise, I'd go with 1/2" square mild steel tubing welded together. If the buffalo is really angry, kick it up to 1" tubing.
 
Yes, a FBD would be the way to go. After that you should add any axial loads and combine the results from the bending & moment results with a Morh analysis.

I am curious where you got the downward force at point b on your diagram. And while you might think that the vertical loads at the hinges are shared it would be best to consider that the full load was only taken by a single hinge, probably the bottom one.
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top