Calculating Forces on a Block with Attached String

  • Thread starter Thread starter mike_24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
A block weighing 3.0N is at rest on a horizontal surface with a 1.0N upward force applied via an attached vertical string. The net force acting on the block is calculated by subtracting the upward tension from the weight, resulting in a downward force of 2.0N on the horizontal surface. The discussion confirms that the attached string is likely connected to the top of the block and a ceiling. Additionally, there is a query about converting Newtons to pounds, but no specific conversion details are provided. The main focus remains on understanding the forces acting on the block.
mike_24
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
A block with a weight of 3.0N is at rest on a horizontal surface. A 1.0N upward force is being applied to the block by means of an attached vertical string. What are the magnitude and the direction of the force of the block on the horizontal surface? I was wondering what it meant by the attached vertical string, is the string attached to the top of the block and then to a ceiling?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mike_24 said:
I was wondering what it meant by the attached vertical string, is the string attached to the top of the block and then to a ceiling?

Yes, that makes sense.
 
This seems like a very easy problem, if I'm approaching it properly. You would have your 3.0N down as your mg and the T would be 1.0N up. Would that mean that the megnitude would be 2.0N downward as a final answer?
 
Newtons to Pounds

I was just wondering how you convert Newtons to pounds
If anyone knows this it would be muchly appreciated
Thanks
 
mike_24 said:
This seems like a very easy problem, if I'm approaching it properly. You would have your 3.0N down as your mg and the T would be 1.0N up. Would that mean that the megnitude would be 2.0N downward as a final answer?

Yes, that is the correct answer.

Sadly, I can't help about the conversion question, but I'm 100% sure that you could google-up an answer in any time.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top