Calculating Free Body Diagram Forces

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the determination of Fy and Fx components in a free body diagram (FBD) of a scissor lift. Participants clarify that the direction of these forces is initially arbitrary, and if the guessed direction is incorrect, the calculated values will be negative, indicating the opposite direction. It is emphasized that forces must be summed according to their marked directions on the diagram, which can lead to confusion if not consistently applied. The middle joint of the scissor lift experiences forces that cancel each other out, resulting in Fy acting in opposite directions to maintain a net force of zero. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of clear direction choices in force calculations for accurate analysis.
Voltux
Messages
29
Reaction score
3
On EngineersEdge.com they have a free body diagram of a scissor lift

https://www.engineersedge.com/mechanics_machines/scissor-lift.htm

Can anyone explain how the Fy, Fx components are determined? What is specifically confusing to me is how Fy is opposite in direction given the system.

To me it would make sense that those could just as easily be swapped and the choice is arbitrary.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The calculation follows to determine Fy etc.

But if you mean, how did they decide what direction to draw the Fy arrows on the FBD, then I would say it is an arbitrary decision.
You know that w acts downwards (at A and D) and that Rx acts inwards (at B and C, in the first setup), from your understanding of the operation of the device.
But you may not have a clear idea of which way Fy and Fx are acting at E. So you just have a guess and mark them in. If you are right, then they work out to be positive. If you are wrong, they work out negative, meaning they actually point in the opposite direction.
That's why you have to be clear in your calculations to add and subtract forces strictly according to the direction you've marked on the diagram. You'll notice that in the calculations, they mark the direction in which they are summing forces. So, for eg., w initially appears as -w, because they are summing forces upwards and w points downward.
 
Merlin3189 said:
So you just have a guess and mark them in. If you are right, then they work out to be positive. If you are wrong, they work out negative, meaning they actually point in the opposite direction.
I don't think you want to imply a 'quality judgement' here. It's not a matter of right or wrong but a totally arbitrary choice of initial direction and the resulting sign of the answer. It might even be a good idea to decide that you would always choose the F to be in a positive x or y direction and that would take away any possibility of getting mixed up on the way through the calculations. In the context of displacement, we usually choose 'up and to the right' for our axes. The obvious exception to this is the dropped object problem where we tend to choose down as the y-axis with a positive g but that, in itself, often causes sign confusion.
 
Absolutely agree with Sophie. I wondered about using that way of saying it, but didn't worry enough about possible misunderstanding.
 
Okay, this makes perfect sense now.

So in very simple terms the middle joint has forces that cancel out, hence the Fy in opposite directions because it does not move. It is supporting forces in both directions and therefore must sum to 0 net force.

Thank you!
 
For fun I was trying to use energy considerations to determine the depth to which a solid object will sink in a fluid to reach equilibrium. The first approach that I tried was just to consider the change in potential energy of the block and the fluid as the block is lowered some unknown distance d into the fluid similar to what is shown in the answer to this post. Upon taking the limit as the vessel's cross sectional area approaches infinity I have an extra factor of 2 in the equilibrium...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
This is just to share some teaching experience. A problem about trajectory of a projectile in the atmosphere is very well known. The trajectory has a vertical asymptote. This fact is easy to obtain by using the stability theory. Consider equations of motion. Let ##\boldsymbol v=v_x\boldsymbol e_x+v_y\boldsymbol e_y## be the velocity of the projectile relative the standard Earth fixed frame ##xy## with ##y## directed upwards. The second Newton ##m\boldsymbol {\dot v}=m\boldsymbol g-\gamma...