Calculating Height from Acceleration and Distance: A Ball Drop Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hellreaver
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the height from which a ball is dropped, given that it travels three-quarters of the distance in the last second of its fall. Participants emphasize the importance of kinematic equations and the constant acceleration due to gravity, which is 9.81 m/s². The key insight is recognizing that if the last second accounts for three-quarters of the total distance, the time of fall can be derived from the relationship between distance and time squared. Ultimately, a more straightforward approach to the problem leads to a height calculation using the formula X = 1/2 a * T², where T is determined to be 2 seconds. The discussion concludes with a participant confirming the height as approximately 19.62 meters.
Hellreaver
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If a ball is dropped from rest and in the last second travels three quarters of the distance, from what height is the ball dropped.

I actually haven't taken physics for about a year, and I'm not taking it in university as a course, but one of my friends showed me this question, and, majoring in math, I was intrigued. Where should one begin on a question like this?
Also, I'm sorry that I don't have any formulas or anything, again, I haven't been to any university classes and am therefore unsure if the formulas remain the same.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hellreaver said:

Homework Statement



If a ball is dropped from rest and in the last second travels three quarters of the distance, from what height is the ball dropped.

I actually haven't taken physics for about a year, and I'm not taking it in university as a course, but one of my friends showed me this question, and, majoring in math, I was intrigued. Where should one begin on a question like this?

Welcome to PF.

Here are some basic kinematic equations that might be able to get you going.
https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=905663&postcount=2
 
Well, let's see...
I know that acceleration is constant, being 9.81.
I would then need to find the distance, and in doing so, I would assume I need the time that the ball is falling. I might even need the final velocity, knowing that the initial velocity is zero.
But therein lays the problem I am faced with: I only have two variables to work with, and those formulas seem to require at least knowing the time, as well as the acceleration. For instance, the distance formula requires me to know 1/2at^2, and I only know the acceleration, and therefore have two unknown variables. I'm not sure where to start with these formulas with the limited information I have been given...

And thank you for the welcome. :D
 
Hellreaver said:
Well, let's see...
I know that acceleration is constant, being 9.81.
I would then need to find the distance, and in doing so, I would assume I need the time that the ball is falling. I might even need the final velocity, knowing that the initial velocity is zero.
But therein lays the problem I am faced with: I only have two variables to work with, and those formulas seem to require at least knowing the time, as well as the acceleration. For instance, the distance formula requires me to know 1/2at^2, and I only know the acceleration, and therefore have two unknown variables. I'm not sure where to start with these formulas with the limited information I have been given...

And thank you for the welcome. :D

But you are provided with the additional information that 1 sec is 3/4 of the distance.

X2 = X1 +a*t1 + 1/2 a*12

t1 is the initial time, that along with acceleration gives initial speed for the time to drop the remaining 3/4.
X1 is the initial distance

X2 is 3 times X1
And you also know X1 = 1/2 a * t12

You end with a quadratic. Not too much for a math major then I should hope.
 
LowlyPion said:
But you are provided with the additional information that 1 sec is 3/4 of the distance.

X2 = X1 +a*t1 + 1/2 a*12

t1 is the initial time, that along with acceleration gives initial speed for the time to drop the remaining 3/4.
X1 is the initial distance

X2 is 3 times X1
And you also know X1 = 1/2 a * t12

You end with a quadratic. Not too much for a math major then I should hope.

It occurred to me that the solution is much easier. You can in this case make use of the observation that since distance is proportional to the square of the time and the distance is 4:1 ... and the Time is T+1 that T must be 2 as the square of 2 is 4. This makes the height calculation remarkably easier. It is simply given by

X = 1/2 a * 22

A much more satisfying road to solution.
 
Sorry, but how did you determine T to be 2? I understand the T+1 part, but I'm unsure of how you reached got 2 as the time...

And I did in fact get 19.62 as an answer with the "long route". Thanks for your help on that.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top