Calculating Hole Size for Desired Flow Rate in Tank/Reservoir

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the hole size needed for a specific flow rate in a tank or reservoir, one can apply energy conservation principles. The kinetic energy of the liquid exiting the hole must equal the work done by the pressure pushing it out. By using the formula Psv = ρsv(v²/2), where P is pressure, s is the area of the hole, and v is the velocity, the relationship between pressure and flow can be established. Ignoring friction simplifies the calculations, allowing for a direct correlation between pressure and the required hole size. This approach effectively determines the necessary dimensions for achieving the desired flow rate.
qazwsxedc
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Specifically, I have a certain flow rate in (volume/sec) and I know the pressure of the resevoir at a certain point. If there is a hole in the tank/resevoir at that point, how big should it be to achieve the given certain flow rate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If you may ignore friction, the easiest approach is to use energy conservation. Kinetic energy of liquid flowing out must be equal to work done by pressure pushing this volume out:

P - pressure, s - area of the hole, v - velocity \rho - density of the liquid
Psv = \rho sv\frac{v^2}{2}
thus
P = \frac{\rho v^2}{2}
 


pressure = potential energy
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top