Calculating Horizontal Force on Ball in Loop-the-Loop Track

  • Thread starter Thread starter Little Dump
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rolling Rotation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the horizontal force on a ball in a loop-the-loop track, specifically when the ball is 1/4 of the way through the loop. The ball starts at a height of 6R and the user is confused about how to account for the work done by gravity in their energy equations. They are using the conservation of energy principle but are unsure about the correct application of angular velocity in their calculations. Clarification is provided that the gravitational potential energy terms already account for the work done by gravity, and the user is advised to ensure consistent definitions of angular velocity in their equations. The conversation highlights the complexities of analyzing rotational motion in this context.
Little Dump
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Ok there's this ball rolling down a ramp. The ball has some radius r and some mass m. At the bottom of the ramp there is a loop. The loop has radius R.

The question is, if the ball is 1/4 of the way completed the loop, what is the horizontal component of the net force on the ball. And it is also given that the ball starts up the ramp at height 6R.

Ok so I've been messing around, and what getting me is that when the ball starts the go up in the loop, gravity will do some work. The problem is, I do not know how to calculate the work done by gravity.

Perhaps I am doing the question wrong because I am analysing the rotation of the ball in the loop, not the actual rotation of the ball itself.

Basically what I am doing is using energy and here's my equations

mg(6R) + Wgrav = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2I(omega)^2 + mgR
and
v = R(omega)

so we make the substitution and solve for omega

then we go back and solve for v

the we do

a = v^2/R

and finally

F=ma

but I may be doing this completely wrong so any help will be great. Here is the original question with diagram:




A small solid marble of mass 12 g and radius 3.8 cm will roll without slipping along the loop-the-loop track shown in Fig. 12-33 if it is released from rest somewhere on the straight section of track. (a) From what initial height h above the bottom of the track must the marble be released if it is to be on the verge of leaving the track at the top of the loop? (The radius of the loop-the-loop is 4.0 m; Note that it is much greater than the radius of the marble.) (b) If the marble is released from height 6R above the bottom of the track, what is the horizontal component of the force acting on it at point Q?


The answer with these number is 0.840N.
 

Attachments

  • untitled.jpg
    untitled.jpg
    3.7 KB · Views: 504
Physics news on Phys.org
I see terms in both sides for gravitational potential energy... that is the work done by gravity!

More precisely, the work done by gravity is the difference in gravitational potential energy, so you've already accounted for the work done by gravity because you've included the GPE terms... you don't need to add an additional work due to gravity term.
 
Alright but I still don't get the right answer.

Should i maybe analyse the ball instead of the loop?


Im really lost
 
Aha, here's your problem:

mg(6R) + Wgrav = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2I(omega)^2 + mgR
and
v = R(omega)

Those are different omegas! In the first equation, omega is the angular velocity with which the ball is rotating, and in the second equation, omega is the angular velocity with which the ball progresses around the center of the loop!


I think what you want here is:

v = r ω

Where this ω is the same as the one in your first equation and r is the radius of the ball. (I'm using the fact that the radius of the loop is much larger than the radius of the ball, thus allowing me to assume the loop is approximately flat)
 
Last edited:
Still no good

more lost then ever

:\

Perhaps someone else has a suggestion?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top