Calculating Impact Speed of Meteor Falling from 811 km

AI Thread Summary
A meteor falling from 811 km with an initial speed of 83.0 m/s will experience a change in potential energy as it descends, which can be calculated using gravitational potential energy formulas. The correct approach involves using energy conservation principles, where the decrease in gravitational potential energy equals the increase in kinetic energy. The formula V=GMm/R+r - GMm/R can be used to find the velocity just before impact, incorporating both the initial velocity and the change in height. It's emphasized that mechanical energy is conserved, and the kinetic energy formula KE = 1/2 mv^2 is crucial for these calculations. Accurate calculations require careful consideration of the Earth's radius in the potential energy equations.
strugglin-physics
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
A meteor has a speed of 83.0 m/s when 811 km above the Earth. It is falling vertically (ignore air resistance) and strikes a bed of sand in which it is brought to rest in 3.31 m. What is its speed just before striking the sand?

So here is the formula that I have but it doesn't give me the right answer.
v=square root of (Vi^2 + 2G(Mass of the Earth)/(Radius of the Earth*1-1/3.31)
I get 9337.6 m/s.

Does anyone see where my mistake is?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the following expression for potential energy

V = -GMm/r

In the r above, don't forget to inculde Earth's radius too.

Use energy conservation for the initial point and the point just before striking.

You don't need to do anything with the sand

spacetime
www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
With the above equation, you need to use it twice! You must find the difference in PE between the two distances from the Earth's center. THe change in PE equals the gain in KE.

It occurs to me. Wouldn't it be neat to see a meteor that ignores air resistance?
 
So you mean use the formula
V=GMm/R+r - GMm/R and that will give me the velocity just before it hits? What about the initial velocity? Does that go in there somewhere?
 
strugglin-physics said:
So you mean use the formula
V=GMm/R+r - GMm/R and that will give me the velocity just before it hits? What about the initial velocity? Does that go in there somewhere?
As Vector Sum and spacetime have explained, mechanical energy is conserved. This means that the decrease in gravitational PE will equal the increase in kinetic energy.
 
strugglin-physics said:
So you mean use the formula
V=GMm/R+r - GMm/R and that will give me the velocity just before it hits? QUOTE]
That forumula is correct for increase in KE.

Remember KE = 1/2 mv^2. This formula ought to be imprinted on the inside of your eyelids.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top