Calculating Kinetic Energy of Rotating Bar

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the kinetic energy of a rotating bar, the bar is divided into infinitesimal segments of mass (dm) to account for varying speeds across its length. The relationship dm/dx = M/L holds true because it reflects the uniform density of the bar, which remains consistent regardless of the segment size. By integrating the kinetic energy formula K = ∫(1/2) dm v², the total kinetic energy can be derived. The linear density is calculated as 6 kg/m, confirming that this value remains constant across different segments of the bar. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately determining the kinetic energy of the rotating bar.
delve
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A thin uniform 12.0-kg bar that is 2.00 m long rotates uniformly about a pivot at one end, making 5.00 complete revolutions every 3.00 seconds. What is the kinetic energy of this bar? (Hint: Different points in the bar have different speeds. Break the bar up into infinitesimal segments of mass dm and integrate to add up the kinetic energy of all these segments.


Homework Equations


K=Integral of 1/2 times dm v^2
dm=M/L *dx


The Attempt at a Solution



I got stuck when trying to substitute dm for M/L*dx. why does dm/dx=M/L if M is the mass of the entire bar and L is the length of the bar?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dm/dx = M/L
Because, each of those quantities is the density. The density is an "intensive" property of a material, it doesn't matter if I have an ocean of water or a cup of water, they are the same density. (technically density would vary with depth in an ocean due to the enormous weight, but that is beside the point)

So your dm/dx is a small portion of the rod but it should give the exact same ratio (same density) as using the entire rod does.

Try it yourself. 12kg / 2m = 6kg/m
The density is 6...
Ok, now use half the rod
6kg / 1m = 6kg/m
Or a fourth of the rod
3kg / 0.5m = 6kg/m
it will always be 6kg/m even with infinitesimal quantities like dm and dx.

[EDIT] Also keep in mind that the actual density would have to be in meters cubed, not just meters. But in this case all we are concerned with is "linear density".
 
Thank you much, that makes sense :)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top