Calculating Launcher Mass from Projectile Acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the mass of a projectile launcher based on the accelerations of both the projectile and the launcher. Participants emphasize the application of Newton's third law, which states that the forces between the projectile and launcher are equal in magnitude but opposite in direction. There is confusion regarding the role of normal forces and whether the projectile is in contact with the launcher during its motion. Ultimately, the consensus is that the launcher exerts a force on the projectile, which in turn exerts an equal and opposite force back on the launcher. The problem was eventually resolved by one participant, who successfully calculated the mass of the launcher.
Balsam
Messages
226
Reaction score
8

Homework Statement


A projectile launcher fires a projectile horizontally from a platform which rests on a flat, icy, frictionless surface. Just after the projectile is fired and while it is moving through the launcher, the projectile has an accelleration of 25m/s^2. At the same time, the launcher has an accelleration of 0.25m/s^2. The mass of the projectile is 0.20kg. Calculate the mass of the launcher.

Given: acceleration of projectile: 25m/s^2[forwards]. Accelleration of launcher: 0.25m/s^2[backwards]. mass of projectile- 0.20kg

Homework Equations



Fnet=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no clue how to solve this. I checked the solution, and according to that, you have to solve for Fnet of the projectile using Fnet=ma, and the net force of the launcher is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to that of the projectile. Then you use Fnet=ma for the launcher and solve for mass. I don't understand why the net force of the launcher is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to that of the launcher. Can someone explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Balsam said:
I don't understand why the net force of the launcher is equal in magnitude but opposite in direction to that of the launcher.
Newton... action and reaction... any memories stirring?
 
As haruspex has said, you need to know about Newton's third law
 
The Vinh said:
As haruspex has said, you need to know about Newton's third law
It just says that any action force will produce a reaction force, what does that have to do with net force? The net force inolves gravity in this case, and since the masses of these 2 obects are different, how can you assume that their net forces are equal in magnitude?
 
Balsam said:
It just says that any action force will produce a reaction force, what does that have to do with net force? The net force inolves gravity in this case, and since the masses of these 2 obects are different, how can you assume that their net forces are equal in magnitude?
right, my mistake,it must be conservation of momentum
 
The Vinh said:
right, my mistake,it must be conservation of momentum
We haven't learned that yet, so I don't know how we would be expected to solve this/
 
i will try figuring a solution
 
No, i was right, we must use Newton's third law, the mass is different but acceleration is different too
 
The Vinh said:
No, i was right, we must use Newton's third law, the mass is different but acceleration is different too
Can you please explain further?
 
  • #10
Balsam said:
any action force will produce a reaction force
Yes. That is, the force body A exerts on body B is equal and opposite to the force body B exerts on body A.
Balsam said:
what does that have to do with net force?
The net force on a body is from summing all forces acting on the body. Any reaction on it from another body contributes.
Balsam said:
The net force inolves gravity in this case
There is a gravitational force, but there is also a normal force, which is here guaranteed to be exactly what is need to prevent it falling through the ice, and no more. Thus, can assume they will cancel.
What does that leave for the net force on the platform?
 
  • #11
The force that makes the projectile move also affects on the launcher
 
  • #12
haruspex said:
Yes. That is, the force body A exerts on body B is equal and opposite to the force body B exerts on body A.

The net force on a body is from summing all forces acting on the body. Any reaction on it from another body contributes.

There is a gravitational force, but there is also a normal force, which is here guaranteed to be exactly what is need to prevent it falling through the ice, and no more. Thus, can assume they will cancel.
What does that leave for the net force on the platform?
Are the projectile and the launcher in contact? I don't think so. What normal forces ?
 
  • #13
The Vinh said:
The force that makes the projectile move also affects on the launcher

Is there a normal force on each object?
 
  • #14
Balsam said:
Are the projectile and the launcher in contact? I don't think so. What normal forces ?
It is the force that perpendiculars to the ground
 
  • #15
The Vinh said:
It is the force that perpendiculars to the ground
But they're not both in contact with the ground
 
  • #16
Balsam said:
Are the projectile and the launcher in contact?
By what magic does the projectile move?
Balsam said:
What normal forces ?
By what magic does the platform avoid falling through the ice?
 
  • #17
haruspex said:
By what magic does the projectile move?

By what magic does the platform avoid falling through the ice?
I think god can do that but not human and especially that we are under the influence of physics laws
 
  • #18
haruspex said:
By what magic does the projectile move?

By what magic does the platform avoid falling through the ice?

Could the inner diameter of the launcher not be wide enough so the projectile is not in contact with the launcher? In that case, it would not be in contact with any surface- no normal force
 
  • #19
Balsam said:
Could the inner diameter of the launcher not be wide enough so the projectile is not in contact with the launcher? In that case, it would not be in contact with any surface- no normal force
Action and reaction does not necessarily consist of contact forces. What force made the projectile move? What was the launcher's role in that?
If the projectile is not in contact with the launcher at all while moving through the muzzle, what is stopping it from falling?
 
  • #20
haruspex said:
Action and reaction does not necessarily consist of contact forces. What force made the projectile move? What was the launcher's role in that?
If the projectile is not in contact with the launcher at all while moving through the muzzle, what is stopping it from falling?
The launcher exerted a force on the projectile, making it move. Does it have to be in contact with the launcher in order to not fall or could the force exerted on it horizontally be large enough to allow the projectile to only move horizontally(at least, initally)?
 
  • #21
Balsam said:
The launcher exerted a force on the projectile, making it move.
Whatever force it exerted on the projectile, and however it exerted it, the projectile exerted an equal and opposite force on the launcher at each instant. The law of conservation of momentum follows from his.
Balsam said:
Does it have to be in contact with the launcher in order to not fall or could the force exerted on it horizontally be large enough to allow the projectile to only move horizontally(at least, initally)?
No amount of horizontal force will affect the vertical motion.
 
  • #22
haruspex said:
Whatever force it exerted on the projectile, and however it exerted it, the projectile exerted an equal and opposite force on the launcher at each instant. The law of conservation of momentum follows from his.

No amount of horizontal force will affect the vertical motion.
Ok, so they must've been in contact
 
  • #23
Balsam said:
Ok, so they must've been in contact
OK, so where are we at in resolving this thread?
 
  • #24
haruspex said:
OK, so where are we at in resolving this thread?
This was from a few days ago, but if I remember correctly, I was able to solve the problem.
 
  • #25
Balsam said:
This was from a few days ago, but if I remember correctly, I was able to solve the problem.
Ok, I'll mark it solved.
 
Back
Top