Calculating low frequency cutoff for this R-C microphone circuit

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the low-frequency cutoff for an R-C microphone circuit, emphasizing the relationship between the period and time constant. The period is noted to be ten times the time constant, which is crucial for understanding the microphone's ability to detect low-frequency sounds. The microphone's function is to convert sound waves into electrical signals, with the output voltage being frequency-dependent. The conversation also touches on the concept of high-pass filters, indicating that the circuit is suitable for frequencies above 200 Hz, with a -3dB cutoff frequency of 32 Hz. Overall, the analysis highlights the importance of understanding impedance and the frequency response of the microphone circuit.
songoku
Messages
2,503
Reaction score
402
Homework Statement
Please see below
Relevant Equations
Q = CV

time constant = RC
1690536080548.png


I want to ask about question (c). My idea is to compare the period and time constant. The period is 0.05 s and time constant is 0.005 s.

Time constant is the time needed for capacitor to discharge until the charge stored in it becomes 37% of initial charge. But I don't know how to relate the period and time constant to answer the question.

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
songoku said:
But I don't know how to relate the period and time constant to answer the question.
You have already related the two. You know that the period is 10 times the time constant. Look at the drawing. It shows sound wave signal in - electrical signal out. Then consider what a microphone is designed to do. Part (b) should guide your thinking.
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and scottdave
kuruman said:
You have already related the two. You know that the period is 10 times the time constant. Look at the drawing. It shows sound wave signal in - electrical signal out. Then consider what a microphone is designed to do. Part (b) should guide your thinking.
Microphone is designed to convert sound energy into electrical energy. When the plates of capacitor move closer, the capacitance increases so the charge increases and the p.d across it decreases.

But sorry I still don't know what is the reason why the period being 10 times the time constant making the microphone suitable to detect low frequency sound.

Thanks
 
songoku said:
Microphone is designed to convert sound energy into electrical energy.
There is more to it than just energy. Suppose a microphone records a conversation between your mother and your father, both speaking equally loud. How can you tell them apart if energy is all that reaches your ears?
 
kuruman said:
There is more to it than just energy. Suppose a microphone records a conversation between your mother and your father, both speaking equally loud. How can you tell them apart if energy is all that reaches your ears?
The frequency of their voice is different?
 
Yes. So what is a microphone designed to do?
 
kuruman said:
Yes. So what is a microphone designed to do?
To detect sound with different frequency
 
That's only half of the story. What's the other half? Look at the drawing again. You see sound of different frequency come in on the left. What else do you see?
 
kuruman said:
That's only half of the story. What's the other half? Look at the drawing again. You see sound of different frequency come in on the left. What else do you see?
The sound wave hits one plate of capacitor, causing it to vibrate then change the p.d on resistor so the output signal will be AC
 
  • #10
And what should the frequency of this AC signal be in an ideal situation?
 
  • Like
Likes songoku and jim mcnamara
  • #11
kuruman said:
And what should the frequency of this AC signal be in an ideal situation?
For this question, I think it should be 20 Hz
 
  • #12
Are you saying that the frequencies that vibrate the diaphragm are all converted to 20 Hz? The 20 Hz is just a lower limit for audio frequencies. What did you give for an answer in part (b) to "Explain how the sound wave produces an alternating output signal"?
 
  • #13
kuruman said:
Are you saying that the frequencies that vibrate the diaphragm are all converted to 20 Hz? The 20 Hz is just a lower limit for audio frequencies.
I thought since the microphone wanted to detect 20 Hz then the sound wave hitting the plate was at frequency of 20 Hz.

For normal audio sound range, it should be 20 Hz - 20 kHz.

kuruman said:
What did you give for an answer in part (b) to "Explain how the sound wave produces an alternating output signal"?
When the plates of capacitor move closer, the capacitance increases so the charge increases and the p.d across it decreases. This will cause the p.d. across R increases.

When the plates of capacitor move further away, the capacitance decreases so the charge decreases and the p.d across it increases. This will cause the p.d. across R decreases.

Since the p.d. across R keeps changing, the output signal will be alternating
 
  • #14
songoku said:
Since the p.d. across R keeps changing, the output signal will be alternating
At what frequency? How do you know that the charge decreases and is not (nearly) constant?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
kuruman said:
At what frequency?
I am not sure but I think it would be in the range of audio sound 10 Hz - 20 kHz.

kuruman said:
How do you know that the charge decreases and is not (nearly) constant?
Because if the capacitance increases, I think the ability of the capacitor to store charge increases so more charge would flow in the circuit
 
  • #16
songoku said:
I am not sure but I think it would be in the range of audio sound 10 Hz - 20 kHz.
Yes, you want the output voltage be in the audible range unattenuated. The job of a microphone is to convert air vibration frequencies to voltage frequencies.
songoku said:
Because if the capacitance increases, I think the ability of the capacitor to store charge increases so more charge would flow in the circuit
Why do you say that the capacitance increases? Imagine the diaphragm vibrating at 1000 HZ. In one second the capacitance increases and decreases 2000 times per second. It gets more complicated if you have a superposition of frequencies instead of a pure tone.

Let's try another approach. If the input voltage is ##V_{\text{in}}## and the output voltage ##V_{\text{out}}##, can you find an expression for the ratio ##V_{\text{out}}/V_{\text{in}}##? It should be frequency-dependent. Plot the ratio as a function of frequency and see what you can say about it.
 
Last edited:
  • #17
kuruman said:
Why do you say that the capacitance increases? Imagine the diaphragm vibrating at 1000 HZ. In one second the capacitance increases and decreases 2000 times per second. It gets more complicated if you have a superposition of frequencies instead of a pure tone.
Because of the statement from the question: "The sound waves cause the flexible front plate to vibrate and change the capacitance. Moving the plates closer together increases the capacitance. Moving the plates further apart decreases the capacitance"

So I thought since the capacitance is changing, the charge and p.d also changing.

kuruman said:
Let's try another approach. If the input voltage is ##V_{\text{in}}## and the output voltage ##V_{\text{out}}##, can you find an expression for the ratio ##V_{\text{out}}/V_{\text{in}}##? It should be frequency-dependent. Plot the ratio as a function of frequency and see what you can say about it.
By input voltage, do you mean the voltage of the battery?

Thanks
 
  • #18
songoku said:
So I thought since the capacitance is changing, the charge and p.d also changing.
Yes it is changing. You said "increasing" and I wanted to be sure that you understood that it is also decreasing.
songoku said:
By input voltage, do you mean the voltage of the battery?
I mean the voltage across the capacitor. Assume that it's an AC signal of some frequency ##\omega.##
 
  • #19
kuruman said:
I mean the voltage across the capacitor. Assume that it's an AC signal of some frequency ##\omega.##
This is what I can come up with (although I am pretty sure this is not what you want):

Let ##V_{\text{in}}=A \sin (\omega t)## and ##V_{\text{battery}} = \varepsilon##

$$V_{\text{in}} + V_{\text{out}} = \varepsilon$$
$$V_{\text{out}} = \varepsilon - V_{\text{in}}$$
$$\frac{V_{\text{out}}}{V_{\text{in}}}=\frac{\varepsilon}{A \sin (\omega t)}-1$$
 
  • #20
You can't have ##A## on the right hand side because it is unknown. The battery keeps the capacitor charged and the only AC component comes from ##V_{\text{in}}.## Consider that as your AC source and do a proper analysis taking into account the impedance of the circuit.
 
  • #21
Apologies for interrupting the flow of this conversation.

Using the values given, ##\frac 1{RC}=## 200Hz – a whole order of magnitude greater than 20Hz.

This tells us that the circuit is certainly suitable for frequencies greater than 200Hz. But the question asks why the circuit is suitable for frequencies of only "about... 20Hz” - this is potentially confusing.

The original question – worth a meagre 4 marks – might be expecting application of some basic knowledge of high-pass RC filters.

If the OP has covered high-pass RC filters they might want to revise the topic first.

The -3dB cut-off frequency is 32Hz, still above 20Hz. But, using this cut-off frequency (which requires prior knowledge of high-pass RC filters), it makes a bit more sense in the context of the question.
 
  • #22
kuruman said:
You can't have ##A## on the right hand side because it is unknown. The battery keeps the capacitor charged and the only AC component comes from ##V_{\text{in}}.## Consider that as your AC source and do a proper analysis taking into account the impedance of the circuit.
$$\frac{V_{\text{out}}}{V_{\text{in}}}=\frac{R}{X_C}$$
$$=R \omega C$$

Not sure how to draw the graph of ##\frac{V_{\text{out}}}{V_{\text{in}}}## against ##\omega## because C is not constant.

##C=\epsilon_o \frac{A}{d}## and the value of ##d## is changing. Is it also frequency-dependent?

Steve4Physics said:
Using the values given, ##\frac 1{RC}=## 200Hz – a whole order of magnitude greater than 20Hz.

This tells us that the circuit is certainly suitable for frequencies greater than 200Hz.
Sorry I don't understand this part. Why the circuit is suitable for frequencies greater than 200 Hz?

Steve4Physics said:
The original question – worth a meagre 4 marks – might be expecting application of some basic knowledge of high-pass RC filters.

If the OP has covered high-pass RC filters they might want to revise the topic first.

The -3dB cut-off frequency is 32Hz, still above 20Hz. But, using this cut-off frequency (which requires prior knowledge of high-pass RC filters), it makes a bit more sense in the context of the question.
I don't study high-pass RC filters. This question is in chapter "Capacitor" and the things I learn in the chapter is about ##C = \frac{Q}{V}## , charging and discharging and equation of ##x=x_o e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}}##

Thanks
 
  • #23
songoku said:
Sorry I don't understand this part. Why the circuit is suitable for frequencies greater than 200 Hz?
It was using prior knowledge. I recognised the circuit to be a high-pass filter and knew that the cut-off frequency was of order ##\frac1{RC}## which is 200Hz.

songoku said:
I don't study high-pass RC filters. This question is in chapter "Capacitor" and the things I learn in the chapter is about ##C = \frac{Q}{V}## , charging and discharging and equation of ##x=x_o e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}}##
It is extremely difficult (IMO) to answer the question with only this knowledge. As already noted by @kuruman, you could do an analysis based on impedance/reactance. I'll give you a (possibly too big) start....

##R## and ##C## form a potential divider with ##V_R## and ##V_C## the amplitudes of the alternating voltages. We want ##V_R## to be large, as this is the output voltage.

We apply sound of frequency ##f##. This results in an alternating current of the same frequency in the circuit.

a) If ##V_R > V_C## we have a 'strong' output.
b) If ##V_R < V_C## we have a 'weak' output.
c) If ##V_R=V_C##, this is the ‘cut-off’ condition.

Since we have a potential divider, to meet condition a) we require ##R## to be greater than than ##X_C##. I.e. ##R>\frac 1 {2\pi fC}##. Solving that gives us the frequency range for a strong output. (Frequencies well outside this range will produce only very weak outputs, so the microphone would be unsuitable for such frequencies).

Find the frequency range of the microphone and show us your working/result.
 
  • #24
Steve4Physics said:
##R## and ##C## form a potential divider with ##V_R## and ##V_C## the amplitudes of the alternating voltages. We want ##V_R## to be large, as this is the output voltage.

We apply sound of frequency ##f##. This results in an alternating current of the same frequency in the circuit.

a) If ##V_R > V_C## we have a 'strong' output.
b) If ##V_R < V_C## we have a 'weak' output.
c) If ##V_R=V_C##, this is the ‘cut-off’ condition.

Since we have a potential divider, to meet condition a) we require ##R## to be greater than than ##X_C##. I.e. ##R>\frac 1 {2\pi fC}##. Solving that gives us the frequency range for a strong output. (Frequencies well outside this range will produce only very weak outputs, so the microphone would be unsuitable for such frequencies).

Find the frequency range of the microphone and show us your working/result.
For cut-off condition:

$$R=X_C$$
$$R=\frac{1}{2\pi f C}$$
$$f=32 Hz$$

So for f = 20 Hz, the output will be 'weak' and the microphone is not suitable to detect the frequency?
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
  • #25
Sorry @Steve4Physics but question (c) asks for a reason why the circuit is suitable, not why it is not suitable. Or in your opinion the question is wrong?

Thanks
 
  • #26
songoku said:
So for f = 20 Hz, the output will be 'weak' and the microphone is not suitable to detect the frequency?
As the frequency falls below 32Hz, there isn’t a sudden drop in output – it’s a gradual reduction referred to as ‘roll-off’.

There will still be some output at 20Hz. In fact the output will be about half of what you would get at high frequencies. So at 20Hz there is a reduced, but still significant, output.

You can't (IMO) be expected to realise this without doing the necessary calculations.
 
  • #27
songoku said:
Sorry @Steve4Physics but question (c) asks for a reason why the circuit is suitable, not why it is not suitable. Or in your opinion the question is wrong?
The question is not wrong. But to answer it requires you to work out the circuit's output at 20Hz. You can't do this with only a basic knowledge of RC circuits. You need to have covered the relevant AC circuit theory (e.g. adding impedances); unless you have covered this, the question can't be answered properly. Have you covered AC theory?

Edit - typos' fixed.
 
Last edited:
  • #28
Steve4Physics said:
Have you covered AC theory?
More like I read it by myself. I know the formula of impedance
$$Z=\sqrt{R^2 + (X_C)^2}$$

Actually the answer has just been sent to students
1690897060688.png


I don't understand the part "capacitor completes discharging / charging during cycle of signal"

1) Does the capacitor discharge when the capacitance changes from increasing to decreasing so the charge also changes from increasing to decreasing?

2) When capacitor discharges, there will be current flows from the capacitor. Is this current in the opposite direction of current from the battery?

3) The capacitor will be completely discharged or charged after around 5 time constant. But why is this important to determine that the circuit is suitable for 20 Hz?

Thanks
 
  • #29
This problem is a bit of a hash. It is important but badly presented. The last line of the supplied solution is dimensionally wrong.
3)The crux of the Physics is in your third question. The net signal power from the microphone circuit depends upon volts and amps. If the capacitor is not given sufficient time to discharge at least halfway, the signal will be much diminished.
2)The current flows both directions as the microphone oscillates about equilibrium
1)The capacitor will either charge or discharge depending upon whether squeezed or pulled. The battery will maintain this on average
 
  • #30
songoku said:
I don't understand the part "capacitor completes discharging / charging during cycle of signal"
The wording is misleading because it could be interpreted as 'complete charging' and 'complete discharging' - whic is wrong. (It would be apporoximately true if the signal were a low frequency square wave - a bit like connecting a battery to R and C in series, then reversing the battery polarity, and keep repeating this.)

The model anwer gives no explanation of why the circuit operates as a high-pass filter (rather than a low-pass one). To me, the model answer is muddled and unsuitable. And, as already noted by @hutchphd, the last line is wrong.

songoku said:
1) Does the capacitor discharge when the capacitance changes from increasing to decreasing so the charge also changes from increasing to decreasing?
2) When capacitor discharges, there will be current flows from the capacitor. Is this current in the opposite direction of current from the battery?
3) The capacitor will be completely discharged or charged after around 5 time constant. But why is this important to determine that the circuit is suitable for 20 Hz
During each sound-cycle, there are 4 stages, corresponding to the 4 parts ( +-+-) of a sine curve:

i) While the pressure increases, plate-separation decreases, capacitance increases, stored charge increases, current flows (in, let’s say, the +ve direction).

ii) While the pressure decreases, returning to P_0, plate-separation increases, capacitance decreases, stored charge decreases, current flows (in the -ve direction).

iii) While the pressure continues to decreases (below ##P_0##, plate-separation increases, capacitance decreases, stored charge decreases, current flows (in the -ve direction).

iv) While the pressure increases back to ##P_0##, plate-separation decreases, capacitance increases, stored charge increases, current flows (in the +ve direction).

Note that the charge on the capacitor will oscillate about its rest-value. We can not think in terms of charging and discharging the capacitor in simple DC terms. Treating the capacitor as fully charged or fully discharged after 5 time-constants is irrelevant - we are not dealing with the DC case.

I don't like either the question or the model answer.

EDIT: Sorry - various problems with partially completed reply getting posted.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K